Regmi research series



Download 0.98 Mb.
Page1/22
Date19.02.2017
Size0.98 Mb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   22
1.

Regmi Research (Private) Ltd,

Kathmandu: December 1, 1973.


REGMI RESEARCH SERIES

Commutative Index For 1973


************


Page

1. Palpa's Regulation With Nepal and Oudh … 1

2. The Muslim Invasion of Nepal … 7

3. An Appeal For The Abolition Of Slavery …15-20, 29-35, 41-53, 62-65

4. Chronology Of Events During King

Prithvi Narayan Shah's Campaign Of

Territorial Expansion … 21

5. Ban On Lani Transactions, 1806 … 28

6. The Nepalganj Market … 35

7. Ancient Settlements In Kathmandu Valley … 36

8. Currency Units, 1850 40

9. Customs And Usages Of Rajvamshis In Morang … 48

10. Imposition Of Gadimubarakh Levy In Kumaun … 49

11. Annexation Of The Malla Kingdoms … 54

12. Unsuccessful Attempts To Annex The

Chaubisi Kingdoms And Reconciliation

With The English … 66

Contd……..

ii.

13. Supplies For Munition Facatories … 73-78, 98-100



14. Arms And Ammunition For Garhwal Front … 77

15. Rates of Transit Duties As Chhoprak, Gorkha … 80

16. Annexation Of The Sen Kingdoms … 81

17. Political Boundaries Of Nepal … 86

18. Nepal Coins During The Medieval Period … 91

19. The Last Days Of Prithvi Narayan Shah … 101

20. Pratap Malla … 104

21. Resumption Of Guthi Land Endowments In Jajarkot … 112

22. Interviews With Baburam Acharya … 119-120, 133-137,

141-147, 165-166,

182-193, 210-215,

221-228


23. After Pratap Malla … 121

24. Permission To Salmis to Use Palanquins … 129

25. Privileges Of Gumba In Mugu … 130

26. Caste Status of Meches … 138

27. Chak-Chakui Levies … 139

[…………………………………………………………………]

28. Disguised English Travellers … 148-159, 167-171

1155
GERMAN ORIANTAL SOCIETY

[……………………………….]

[……………………………….]


CONTD……….

iii.
29. Restoration Of Abolished Rajyas … 160

30. Law And Order In Nepalganj, 1897 … 161

31. Royal Order On Sanitation, 1840 … 163

32. Control Of Interest Rates In Western Hill Areas, 1799 … 164

33. Chronology Of Patan … 172

34. A Geographical Description Of Kathmandu

Valley During The Lichchhavi Period … 177

35. Sex And Marriage Regulations … 181

37. Trade And Industry In Ancient Nepal … 194

38. History Of Patan … 196-200, 201-204

39. Miscellaneous Documents On Nepal-China War … 206-9, 236-239

40. Selected Letters Of Prithvi Narayan Shah … 216

41. Ancient Khas Culture … 229

42. Depopulation of Raikar Lands In Eastern Tarai … 239

43. Proposal For East-West Highway, 1949 … 240

***********

iv.


1155
GERMAN ORIENTAL SOCIETY

(DEUTSCHE MORGENLAENDISCHE

OESELLSCHAFF, EV, W, GERMANY)

Regmi Research (Private) Ltd,

Kathmandu: January 1, 1973.

Regmi Research Series

Year 5, No. 1,


Edited By,

Mahesh C. Regmi.


*************
Contents
Page

1. Palpa's Regulation With Nepal and Oudh … 1

2. The Muslim Invasion of Nepal … 7

3. An Appeal For The Abolition Of Slavery … 15


**************

Regmi Research (Private) Ltd,

Lazimpat, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Compiled By Regmi Research (Private) Ltd for private study and research. Not meant for public sale or display.

1.

Palpa's Regulation With Nepal and Oudh1


By
Mahesh Raj Pant.
***********
The Kingdom Of Palpa also comprised territory in the Tarai. Palpa was therefore a wealthy Kingdom. For its Tarai territory, the Kings of Palpa used to make some payments to the Nawab of Oudh.2
Some of the Chaubise Kingdoms were strong. Palpa was one of them. In his capital of Regent, Bahadur Shah planned to expande westwart. However, Palpa was a major important in this task. Relation between Gorkha and Palpa were not cordial.3 Bahadur Shah therefore made efforts to develop friendly relations with Palpa. Accordingly, he married the daughter of King Mahadatta Sen of Palpa4 on Magh 10, 1842 Vikrama5, when he was 28 years of age.6
____________________________________________

1. Mahesh Raj Pant, ''Palpa Rajyako Nepal Adhirajya Ra Avadhsanga Sambandha.'' (Relations Of The Kingdom of Palpa With The Kingdom of Nepal And With Oudh). Purnima, Year, No. 1, Marga 2028 (November-December 1971), PP. 1-8


2. Naya Raj Pant, Devi Prasad Bhandari, Gautam Bajra Bajracharya and Dinesh Raj Pant, Shri 5 Prithvi Narayan Shah Ko Upadesh (Teachings of King Prithvi Narayan Shah), PP. 633-635; Mahesh Raj Pant, ''Nepal Sanga Wazir Ali Kandako Sambandha'' (Nepal's Connection With The Wazir Ali Affair). Purnima, 24, Magh-Chaitra 2027 (January-March 1971), PP. 268-278 (Tranlated in Regmi Research Series, Year 3, No. 7, July 1, 1971, PP. 158-174.
3. Dinesh Raj Pant, ''Ashrit Rajya Upar Bahadur Shahle Liyeko Niti.'' (Bahadur Shah's Policy Towards Vassal States), Purnima, 6, Shrawan 2022 (July 1965), PP. 51-55.
4. Dilli Raman Regmi, Modern Nepal, PP. 109-110; Chittaranjan Nepali, Shri 5 Rana Bahadur Shah (King Rana Bahadur Shah), P. 7. (Translated in Regmi Research Series Year 2, No. 12, December 1, 1970, PP. 286-297.
5. Bahadur Shah was born in Ashadh 1814 Vikrama. Naya Raj Pant, op. cit. P. 500.
6. ''Mahadatta also entered into strictest alliance with Bahadur Shah, younger son of Prithvi Narayan, and regent of Gorkha during the minority of Rana Bahadur. In order to cement the friendshwip, Mahadatta gave his daughter in marriage to the regent ….' Francis Buchanan Hamilton, An Account Of The Kingdom of Nepal And The Territoried Annexed To This Domination By The House Of Gorkha, P. 173.

Contd……..


2.

Bahadur Shah wanted to extend the frontiers of Nepal, which at that time was bounded by the Kali-Gandakt river. He sent an army to recover territory un the west during a period a of 6 moths between Jestha 10 and Marga 7, 1843 Vikrama.7 In this campaign of conquest, Nepal as assigned by King Mahadatta Sen of Palpa.8 Bahadur Shah therefore gave him the territory comparing the nowly-conquered principalitities of Gulmi, Argha and Khanchi.9



__________________________________
7. Ramji Tiwari, ''Vo. Sam. 1813 Ma Bhayeko Kehi Mukhya Ghatana.'' (Some Important Events of The Vikrama Year 1813). Purnima, 2, Shrawan, 2021 (July 1964), PP. 61-68.
8. ''These friends soon entered into a most iniquitous combination. The Gorkha family had hitherto entirely failed in all their attempts to extend their dominations to the west, and of Palpa had continued to assist the neighboring Rajyas, it is probably, that their resistance to Gorkha might have been continued with success, but the father and son-in-law agreed, that they should make a common cause, and divide the spoil. This scheme completely succeeded, and Damodar Pande, and Khas by birth, but representative of one of the chief families in Gorkha, and a most gallant offices, was sent in command of the regent's forces.'' Hamilton, op. cit. P. 173.
9. Shakti Ballabh Aryal, Jayaramakarnatak. (Edited and translated by Dhanabajra Bajracharya and Jnyan Mani Nepal), PP. 142 and 234, Also: ''After the conquest, Damodar took for his master the lion's share, but allowed Mahadatta to retain as master Gulmi, Argha and Kahi, three of the states that had been long in alliance with his family, and which he was bound to protect, but only by the duty of alliance, but of kindred, for the Raja of Argha was his uncle.'' Hamilton, op. cit. P. 173. See also: East India Campany, Papers Respecting The Nepal War, London). L. Cok, 1842. on Page 19, this book contains an English translation of a letter written by Kaji Ambar Simha Thapa (Senior) to Governor-General Hastings of the East India Company. ''The entire world knows that the Rajas of Palpa, Pyuthan, Argha, Khanchi, and Gulmi were independent in their territoried and that they were subjugated by the Gorkha government by the grace of God. Because he accepted a vassal status, the Raja of

3.
Mahadatta Sen's relations with Nepal could not remain cordial10 after Bahadur Shah's death on Ashadh 14, 1854 Vikrama.11


Mahadatta Sen was succeeded by his son, Prithivi Pal Sen.12 After this, Rana Bahadur Shah occupied the hill areas of Gulmi which had been incorporated into Prithvi Pal Sen's Kingdom, and restored them to Siddhi Pratap, the their to Gulmi's throne.13
Rana Bahadur Shah decided to renounce the world after abdicating in favor of the 18 moths old Girban Yuddha Vikram Shah,14 who was born to him from Kantimati, his favorite queen. He then summoned King Prithvi Pal Sen of Palpa to apply the Rajyatilak on the forehead of Girban Yuddha Vikram Shah on the occasion of the latter's coronation.15 On Falgun 28, 1855 Vikrama, King Girban Yuddha Vikram Shah was crowned King of Nepal.19
_____________________________________________

10. Dinesh Raj Pant, ''Daivajnyashiromani Laxmipati Pande.'' (The Astrologer Laxmipati Pande), Purnima, 10, Shrawan 2023 (July), PP. 46-53.


11. ''Mahadatta was very soon forced to eat the frit of his villainy. Damodar advanced the conquests of his nation to the west, and, having subdued Kumaun, all resistance to his force on the hills was in vain and Mahadatta was soon deprived of all the hope of protection, that be might have had from from the power of his son-in-law- regent, the young Raja of Gorkha having put his uncles to death. The friendship of the Nawab Vazir, however, saved Mahadatta, nor was any ancroachment made on Palpa, as long as the lived.'' Hamilton, op. cit. PP. 173-174.
12. Mahesh Rah Pant, op. cit. PP. 273-274.
13. ''Prithvi Pal succeeded his father, when very young, and was endowed with great personal vigour, nor was he, I believe, at all scrupulous about means; but he seems to have been rash and credulous, which dered him totally unable to resist the wiles of the people of Gorkha, who were afraid to use opne violence, on account of his connexion with the Nawab Vazir. They did not therefore molest his ancient dominations, nor any of the territory that he had acquired in the plains, all of which was tributary to the Nawab; but, immediately after his accession, Rana Bahadur, King of Gorkha and Nepall, compelled the Raja of Palpa to restore the mountains of Gulmi to Siddhi Pratap, the legal heir of that country, whose sister Rana Bahadur had married.'' Hamiltin, , op. cit. P. 174.
14. Dinesh Raj Pant, ''Daivajnya Shiromani Laxmipati pande.'' op. cit. PP. 49-50; ''Bagmati Pillar Inscription'', published in Dhanabajra Bajracharya, Triratnasaundaryagatha, PP. 293 and 296-297.
15. Mahesh Raj Pant, op. cit. P. 285.

4.
Just at this time, the deposed Nawab Wazir Ali of Oudh was mobilizing his troops in the borders of Palpa after assassinating the English respresentative at Varansi. The Bhardars of Palpa wanted to Provide some assistance to him. However, they received strict orders from Kathmandu not to do so. As a result, Wazir Ali failed to get any support from Palpa. He had sent a request also to the government of Nepal seeking assistance. Instead of providing him with assistance in any form, the Nepal government took sides with the company government. It even dispatched its troops to expel Wazir Ali from the borders of Palpa. Wazir Ali was eventually forced out of that area.17


Even after the end of the coronation ceremony, Prithvi Pal Sen stayed on in Kathmandu until 1856 Vikrama.18
Queen Kantimati died in 1856 Vikrama, Rana Bahadur Shah was so grief stricken over her death that he became insane and went so far to set fire to the houses of some of the physicians who had treated Queen Kantimati, and have their hands crushed through an oil crusher. He even ordered the beheading of some of these physicians. Rana Bahadur Shah insulted all those deities who had beeen worshipped for the recovery of Kantimati.19
These acts on the part of Rana Bahadur Shah cuased considerable excitement and concern among the Bhardars and people of Nepal. The Bhardars thought that it would be impossible to carry on the administration of the counnry if the Swami Maharaj (i.e. Rana Bahadur Shah) remained in their midst. Accordingly, they took King Girban Yuddha Vikram Shah to Nuwakot. They also shifted the capital to Nuwakot. This further infuriated Rana Bahadur Shah. His anger grew further when Balabhada Shah informed him that the Bhardars were conspiring to arrest him. The Swami Maharaj then thought of attacking Nuwakot with the help of the Bhardars who were loyal to him. He declared that he resumed hi royal duties. He ordered forts to be built at Pulcho
__________________________________

17. Ibid, PP. 268-288.

18. Ibid, PP. 285.

19. Triratnasaundaryagatha, op. cit. PP. 154-162, 189-190.


Contd………….

5.
and Paknajol. He ordered troops deployed at different places to join his forces.20 However, the Bardars staying in Nuwakot made efforts to insure that the troops did not revolt and that the attack on Nuwakot did not take place. They also summoned troops scattered at different places. Having become aware of the adequate defensive preparations by the Bhardars, Rana Bahadur Shah felt convinced that they were in a stronger position than his side. He, therefore, Left for Vanarasi on Jestha 8, 1857 Vikrama.


Antipating an attack on Nuwakot by Rana Bahadur Shah, the Bhardars staying in Nuwakot summoned the Chautariyas, Kajis and sardars of Palpa. As they were on their way to Nuwakot, the threat of attack by Rana Bahadur Shah vanished as he left for Varanasi. The officials from Palpa were therefore directed to go back to Palpa. The Bhardars (of Nepal) were naturally worried over the possibility of King Prithvi Pal Sen of Palpa taking sides with Rana Bahadur Shah. They felt that their position might become difficult of Prithvi Pal Sen joined hands with Rana Bahadur Shah. They, therefore, sent a message to Prithvi Pal Sen on behalf of King Girban Yuddha Vikram Shah on Jestha 9, 1857 Vikrama, telling him that the old treaty concluded with him had been confirmed and asking him to come to Nuwakot.21
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­_______________________________________

20. Samshodhan Mandal, Savadhan-Patra (A Note of Warning). No. 13, PP. 8-10; Dhanbajra Bajracharya and Jnyan Mani Nepal (eds), Atihasik-Patra Sangraha (A Collection of Historical Letters), Part I, PP. 97-100.; Triratnasaundaryagatha, op. cit. 162-163, 286-290; Chittaranjan Nepali, Shri 5 Rana Bahadur Shah, PP. 43-45. (Translated in Regmi Research Series, Year 3, No. 3, March 1, 1971, PP. 68-75) and PP. 133-134; Mahesh C. Regmi (eds), Regmi Research Series, Year 3, No. 4, April 1, 1971, PP. 76-80); Ahankar Man Rajvanshi, ''Vi. Sam. 1857 Ko Euta Aitihasik Kagat.'' (An Historical Document of The Vikrama Year 1857), Purnima, 19, Kartik-Poush 2025 (October-December 1968), PP. 198-202, 205-207; Dinesh Raj Pant, Daivajnyashiromani Laxmipati Pande, op. cit. PP. 50-51.


21. From King Girban to the Chautariyas, Kajis, and Sardars of Palpa. ''Since we had urgent work here, we had asked you for to come here urgently. The work which had been started here has been accomplished. You five Chautariyas, Kajis and Sardars should now return from the place where you have reached and attend toyour household affairs. You may think that since you have already come half of the way, you should go back after offering your Salaams (to us). (But) the time for work has come and you may be infested with malaria on the way. You therefore need not come here. Go back. Remain careful about affairs in that area. Collect information about developments in Lucknow and send report to us. Jestha Badi 11, 1857'' Regmi Research Series, Year 3, No. 4, April 1, 1971, P. 80
Contd……..

6.
Rana Bahadur Shah, who was then staying at Varanasi, thought that it would be easy for him return to Nepal if he could win over Prithvi Pal Sen to his side. He therefore continued sending letters to Prithvi Pal Sen. However, Prithvi Pal Sen did not heed his suggestion and took sides with Damodar Pande. On the other hand, Prithvi Pal Sen's uncle,22 Chautara Surbir Sen, and Kaji Ranamardan Sen of Palpa, were inclined towards supporting Rana Bahadur Sha. They too sent a message to Rana Bahadur Shah. In reply to their message, Rana Bahadur Shah stated that he would make special arrangements for them in case they helped him by creating a rift between Prithvi Pal Sen and Damodar Pande. This letter was dated Marga 19, 1857 Vikrama. Ranga Nath Paudel too wrote a letter to them asking them to stand actively by Rana Bahadur Shah. This letter had been carried to Palpa by a Brahman named Padmapani Pandit.23


_____________________________________

(Contd)


Also: From King Girban to Raja Prithvi pal Sen (of Palpa). ''Yesterday, my father had issued a copper inscription (containing the text of a treaty with Palpa). I too confirm the signature on this copper inscription. With due loyalty, come here to join the Army. Do whatever become necessary with the advice of the Bhardars. In case you do not come at this moment, we shall think that you have proved false to your duty. You have been informed in advance. Come here soon faithfully. Jestha Badi 11, 1857'' Regmi Research Series, Year 3, No. 4, April 1, 1971. P. 79.
22. Shankar Man Rajvanshi (ed), Sen Vamshavali, PP. 28-29.
23. Records of the Kausi Toshakhana Office: From Shri Shri Shri Mahanirvananda Swami (with titiles) to Chautara Surbir Sen and Kaji Ranamardan sen (the titles). Greetings. We wish both of you well. We have received you letter and noted the contents. Previously too, our mother had issued you a royal order granting you honors and favors. Today, you should extricate your King from the conspiracy of bad elements and help me to strengthen my position. In case I am able to do so, we shall bestow greater honors and favors on you. Rest assured in this respect, you will get more detailed information from the letter of Shri Shri Shri Pandit as well as personally from Padmapani Pandit. What more 9to wise people?). Camp: Banaras. Monday. Marga Sudi 15 (corresponding to Marga 19, 1857) Vikrama.''

************

7.
The Muslim Invasion of Nepal1
By
Baburam Acharya
*********
(In an introductory note, Naya Raj Pant wrties: ''Before giving me a copy of this article, Baburam Acharya made the following revelations: ''I had first given this article for publication in the Sharade. Howver, the magazine refused to publish it without the permission of the Nepali Language Publications Board (Nepali Prakashani Samiti). The article was therefore forwarded to the Board, which stated that it could not give clearance without consulting Mrigendra Shamsher, its Director-General. Mrigendra Shamsher replied that he had no knowledge of history and so I should approach his uncle, General kaisar Shamsher of the southern commane. I then met General Kaiser Shamsher. He told me that he had no time to read the article. However, he asked me to leave the article with him so that he could read it later. Some months later, Kashi Prasad Jayaswal came to Nepal. He published the text of the stone inscription located at Swayambhu,which referred to the Muslim invasion of Nepal, in the Journal Of The Bihar And Orissa Research Society. Kaiser Shamsher later asked me why I had giver the article to Kashi Prasad Yayaswal. I denied having done so. I also stated, ''These were some persons who had watched me reproducing the stone inscription at Swyambhu. They inclused Tilak Shamsher Thapa and the Gubhaju of Ghantaghar. Kashi Prasad Jayaswal might have learnt of the Muslim invasion of Nepal from these people. Moreover, Kashi Prasad Jayaswal, in the article, has made no reference to the Gopalraj Vamshavali, which I have used as one of my sources.'' At this, Kaiser Shamsher thundered, ''What do you think of me. Don't you realize I can sack you?'' I retorted, ''So many people have migrated to Darjeeling only because you wield such powers.'' After his visit to Nepal, Rahul had published an article praising both Kaiser Shamsher and the Mahile Guruju (Hem Rah Pande). On the other hand, Jayaswal praised the Mahila Guruju alone. Kaiser Shamsher was away from Kathmandu during Jayaswal's visit. Kaiser Shamsher had taken offense at Jayaswal's failure to praise him along with the Mahila Guruju. He therefore poured his wrath on me. You

______________________________________________

1. Baburam Acharya, ''Nepalma Bhayeko Musalmani Akraman'' (The Muslim Invasion of Nepal). Purnima, 27, Aswin 2029 (October 1972), PP. 155-161.

Contd………


8.
may make a copy of this article if you so wish. If I lose it, a copy will remain with you. ''With these words, Baburam Acharya handed over this article to me as well as the text of the stone inscription at Swayambhu. I gave the text of the stone inscription to Bhola Nath, Dhanabajra and Jnyamani, who first published it in the Sanskrit Sandesh in 2010 Vikrama (1953).''
Unless one reads this article, one will find it hard to believe that Muslims had ever invaded the capital of Nepal. This is natural, because none of the 8 or 10 books that have far been written about the history of Nepal refers to this invasion. Muslims had, in fact, invaded Nepal early in the 15th century according to the Vikrama era. The invasion was a very fierce one. No historian has so far come to know of this invasion, because he has not closely scrutinized ancient documents, Prof. Cecil Bendall of University Collage of Landon, who had made commendable efforts to shed light on the political history of the Newar Kingdoms of Nepal, has written an essay entitled ''Historical Introduction'' on the basis of the catalog of the Nepal Durbar Library. In preparing this essay, he used four Vamshavalis of Nepal and took Photo-copies of some of their folios. I am sure that all these Vamshavalis contain a reference to the Muslim invasion of Nepal. The invasion is also mentioned in the photo-copied obtained by him. even then, he fails to discuss the invasion in his eassay. This leads one to conclude, though reluctantly, that he was ignorant of meaning theof sentences describing the invasion. Another document referring to the Muslim invasion of Nepal is the stone inscription dated Aswin Sudi 15, 492 Nepal era installed at Simbhu in memory of the building of a Chaitya by Rajaharsha. It is these two documents which shed light on the Muslim invasion of Nepal.
The meaning to the sentences contained in the fourth and fifth lines of the document No. 28 (Plate No. 8) cited by Bendall is as follows: ''In the meantime, Sultan Shamshuddin came to Nepal from the east and broke the image of Pashupati into three pieces. The whole of Nepal was ravaged. Panic spread among the entire people. On Marga Sudi 9, 470 Nepal era, a terrible suffering overlook Bhaktapur.'' This event had taken place on September 19, 1349 A.D.
The meaning of the stone inscription located at Simbhu, which is in the Sanskrit language, is as follows: ''King Rajadeva, who was the custodian of two religions (Buddhism and Pauranic), was famous in Nepal. There was a sacred Stupa with the residences of holy men (Muni), on the abode of the Siddhas, situated at the top of Simbhu. It was during his reign that on Thursday, Marga Sudi 10, Nepal era, Sultan Shamsuddin arrived in Nepal with many troops from Bengal, and demolished and burnteverything. Some time later, that wise King died. Thus the stupa burntby the Yavana (Muslims) remained in the same condition.''


Download 0.98 Mb.

Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   22




The database is protected by copyright ©sckool.org 2020
send message

    Main page