The Common Paradigms/Rhetorical Modes Narration



Download 49.5 Kb.
Date08.12.2018
Size49.5 Kb.

The Common Paradigms/Rhetorical Modes
Narration Narration is an event or series of events written to express a specific meaning or significance. According to Lee Brandon, there are five (5) “properties” involved in narration:

1. Situation – the background or setup of the event

2. Conflict – the “friction” or the explanation of the problem(s) within the narrative

3. Struggle – comes from the conflict; how the conflict is dealt with (not necessarily

physical!)



4. Outcome – the result of the struggle; the resolution

5. Meaning – the “moral” of the story; the lesson learned (often, the overall point of the

narration)


** Things to remember:

Tense: Generally, personal narratives are written mostly in the past tense (the event has already passed), though works of literature and summaries are generally written in the present tense.

Point-of-view: If the narrative is personal, first person (I, me, my, we, our, us) may be used (depending on each instructor’s assignment). Third person (he, she, it, they, them) may also be used if appropriate.

Descriptive detail: Make the narrative come alive with sensory descriptions (using the 5 senses) and vivid language (Brandon 102-104).
Process Analysis A “process” is a series of actions, functions, steps, or operations that bring about a particular end or result. The chronologically ordered, interlocking steps of a process focus either on how something works or on how something is done. There are two types of process analysis: informative and directive. Informative process analysis explains how something occurs or is done through key information (such as how a wave forms). Directive process analysis tells the audience how to do something step-by-step (for example, how to bake a cake, write a paper, make a paper airplane). Often, this form of process analysis is written in the second person (using you or your to refer to the reader). The following outline is generally followed with both informative and directive process analysis (Brandon 191):
Introduction (may include background, necessary tools, or other preparatory information)

Step 1 (Phase 1)

Step 2 (Phase 2)

Step 3 (Phase 3)

Step 4 (Phase 4)

Steps 5, 6, 7 . . . (Phases 5, 6, 7 . . .)

** Things to Remember:

Language: Avoid “recipe language” (i.e. dropping articles, subjects of sentences, or prepositions will make your paragraph/essay sound mechanical and choppy).

Transitions: Whether they indicate chronology (First, Next, Finally) or spatial organization (Below…, Beside…, Above…, etc.), transitional words or phrases help to clarify order (Brandon 192).
Descriptive A descriptive paragraph/essay attempts to recreate an object, person, event, etc. for the reader through the use of specific detail. There are two modes of description – objective and subjective.

Objective: A generally unemotional description of the subject. Tends to rely on factual data and visual description.

Subjective: Conveys more feeling than the objective description. Often, students will need to use sensory description (sight, taste, sound, touch, smell) and descriptive language (similes, metaphors, personification) to set a mood. One DOMINANT IMPRESSION (overall single point being emphasized) should be the central focus of the descriptive details.
** Things to remember:

Language: BE SPECIFIC. Avoid saying things are “good,” “bad,” “plain,” etc. Words such as this do not draw any clear picture for the reader. Instead, focus on concrete and clear adjectives.

Order: Spatial organization is almost always the most logical way to organize a paragraph (top to bottom, side to side, front to back). Chronological order can also be used (Brandon 126-130).
Cause and Effect This rhetorical mode allows the writer to closely analyze the “whys?” and “what nows?” of a given event or situation. In general, people encounter causes and effects constantly, so writing about them helps a writer focus on the world around him/her. PLEASE NOTE: not all assignments call for both causes and effects; some assignments only ask for one or the other. A general outline might look like this:
Introduction (includes central event/situation as well as keywords that indicate causes or effects)

Cause 1/ Effect 1

Cause 2/ Effect 2

Cause 3/ Effect 3…

Conclusion
In actual essays, though, the patterns are more complex. They can either proceed deductively from effect to cause, or inductively, from cause to effect. There are many variations, depending on the number of causes or effects to be explained.
** Things to remember:

Order: Writers may follow emphatic order (weakest to strongest cause/effect), or chronological (time) order.

Logic: Don’t assume that something causes something else to happen simply because one follows the other. Be sure to understand the relationship between events (Brandon 213-216).

Analysis by Division For analysis by division, break down the parts of a unit and then analyze each part in relation to the function of the whole (Brandon 168). Analytical essays usually (but not always) examine complex ideas and dissect them into understandable parts. A physical analysis breaks an object into its components, and a conceptual analysis divides an idea into other ideas. Analysis by division requires a principle. The principle is the idea around which a writer breaks up a subject. Each part of the unit must relate to the principle.
Example:
1. Unit Manager

2. Principle of Function Effective as a leader

3. Parts based on the principle Fair, intelligent, stable, competent in the field

4. Discussion Consider each part in relation to the person’s effectiveness as a manager.


(Brandon 168)
The structure of an analysis is this:
Introduction/Topic Sentence/Thesis – establishes the “unit” (subject) and the “principle”

Characteristic 1 (or Part1) – how does this part relate back to the principle?

Characteristic 2 (or Part 2) – how does this relate back to the principle?

Characteristic 3, 4, 5 (or Parts 3, 4, 5) – how do these relate back to the principle?

Conclusion
**Things to remember:

Order: Spatial or chronological organization will be the pattern most often followed. Don’t jump around.

Principle: Make sure that the principle is clear and stated in the topic sentence/thesis.
Classification To classify, you put “persons, places, things, or ideas into groups or classes based on their characteristics” (Brandon 237). Any group of people, objects, or ideas that possesses shared characteristics can be classified. Like analysis by division, classification requires a principle.
Example:
Subject: neighbors

Principle: neighborhood involvement

Classes: friendly, meddlesome, private
(Brandon 237)
Introduction (thesis, including the principle and a listing of the types or classes found)

Subclass 1

Subclass 2

Subclass 3

Conclusion
**Things to remember:

Principle: Pick a principle that clearly includes all of the classes within your topic, and make this principle clear in the topic sentence/thesis statement. Make sure that your classes do not overlap! For example, if in the above example, you included affluent, you would be overlapping classes because affluence relates to wealth, not neighborly involvement (Brandon 237).

Order: Many students find that emphatic order works best for this rhetorical mode. Build up to your strongest subclass.

Word Choice: Avoid terms like good/average/bad or fast/medium/slow. These terms are difficult to define and prove (Brandon 237-238).
Exemplification According to Lee Brandon, author of Paragraphs and Essays, exemplification is a form of writing “using examples to explain, convince, or amuse” (150). This particular style of writing focuses on the use of “specific, vivid and representative” (150) examples to help the writer prove his/her point. For example, if you are writing about sitcoms that are based on a comedian’s stand-up comedy routine, you should point to specific shows such as Seinfeld or Everybody Loves Raymond in your paragraph or essay. Both of these shows are specific examples of the type of sitcom mentioned above. If you are writing about new wave bands of the 1980s, you may point to The Cure, Depeche Mode, and Erasure as representatives of this type of band. A general outline for exemplification would be:
Introduction (including thesis or topic sentence that establishes the subject and controlling idea)

Example 1 with explanation of how it refers to the topic sentence

Example 2 with explanation of how it refers to the topic sentence

Example 3 with explanation of how it refers to the topic sentence

Conclusion
You may also use an “extended” example to prove your point. In this case, you would choose one overall example and provide many details to connect the example to the thesis/topic sentence. For example, if you are writing about raising the age for driver’s licenses to eighteen, you may choose to focus on one specific sixteen-year-old’s dangerous/ thoughtless driving habits to support your point.
**Things to remember:

Pre-writing: Take the time during the pre-writing stage to generate more examples then you think you would need. It is easier to have too many and cut down the list, than it is to have too few.

Order: You may want to move from your more simple examples to your more complex examples or follow emphatic order.
Comparison and/or Contrast Comparison and contrast is the examination of “two or more items for likeness, difference, or both” (Reinking and von der Osten). Some assignments will specify that “comparison” is for identifying similarities and “contrast” is for indicating differences; however, the term “comparison” may be used for both differences and similarities. There are two primary patterns of organization when comparing or contrasting – the “subject-by-subject” pattern and the “point-by-point” pattern.
The subject-by-subject (or block) pattern deals with the two objects to be compared as wholes and examines first one and then the other:
Introduction (includes thesis/topic sentence, sets up comparison)

Subject 1

Characteristic 1


Characteristic 2

Characteristic 3

Subject 2

Characteristic 1

Characteristic 2

Characteristic 3

Conclusion
The point-by-point, which is also called “alternating” comparison, treats the subjects alternately in terms of characteristics they share, examining each characteristic in relation to its opposite:
Introduction (includes thesis/topic sentence sets up comparison)

Characteristic 1

Subject 1

Subject 2

Characteristic 2

Subject 1

Subject 2

Characteristic 3


Subject 1

Subject 2

Conclusion
**Things to remember:

Be aware of the assignment: Some assignments call for just comparison or just contrast.

Purpose: Determine whether you wish to persuade or to inform your reader of something.
Definition “When you define, you identify the features that distinguish a term, thereby putting a fence around it, establishing its boundaries, and separating it from all others” (Reinking and von der Osten). An essay-length definition should be extended, and the writer should begin by placing the subject in a class with characteristics.
Example:
SUBJECT CLASS CHARACTERISTICS

Democracy is a form of government in which voters elect

representatives to manage society

(Brandon 297)


The arrangement of an extended formal definition may take several forms. In fact, it is often the student’s opportunity to incorporate many of the other rhetorical modes (Description, Cause/Effect, Classification, Comparison/Contrast, etc.). Therefore, the pattern or outline of a definition may resemble one of the patterns listed throughout this handout.
**Things to remember:

Language: Word choice is very important with definition. Don’t complicate the definition by using more difficult language to define the subject. Do not use a circular definition (using the term you are trying to define within the definition).

Order: Again, writers often find that emphatic order is best with definition, though spatial or chronological organization may work depending on how the writer chooses to develop his/her term (Brandon 297-301).
References:
Brandon, Lee. Paragraphs and Essays: A Worktext with Readings. New York: Houghton

Mifflin, 2005
Reinking, James A. and Robert von der Osten. Strategies for Successful Writing. 7th ed.

Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2005.





Share with your friends:


The database is protected by copyright ©sckool.org 2019
send message

    Main page