Reparations: The Demand and the Debate

Download 10.17 Kb.
Size10.17 Kb.
Reparations: The Demand and the Debate

The idea of “reparations” has gained new prominence on the political scene over the past two years, even becoming a topic in the 2016 presidential primaries.

In the United States, “reparations” generally refers to the idea that the government and other entities that directly profited from slave labor should provide monetary or other assistance to African Americans to help make amends for the practice of slavery and for the lost wealth African Americans have suffered over the generations as a result of slavery.

While specific definitions of what constitute "reparations" may vary, most definitions consider them to include some form of material compensation for the historic losses to African Americans inflicted by slavery, Jim Crow, and ongoing discrimination.

The National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America (N'Cobra), “a mass-based coalition organized for the sole purpose of obtaining reparations for African descendants in the United States,” provides a definition and a defense of reparations on its website (link is external):

Reparations is a process of repairing, healing and restoring a people injured because of their group identity and in violation of their fundamental human rights by governments or corporations…. In addition to being a demand for justice, it is a principle of international human rights law. As a remedy, it is similar to the remedy for damages in domestic law that holds a person responsible for injuries suffered by another when the infliction of the injury violates domestic law. Examples of groups that have obtained reparations include Jewish victims of the Nazi Holocaust, Japanese Americans interned in concentration camps in the United States during WWII, Alaska Natives for land, labor, and resources taken, victims of the massacre in Rosewood, Florida and their descendants, Native Americans as a remedy for violations of treaty rights, and political dissenters in Argentina and their descendants.

The Trans-Atlantic Slave "Trade" and chattel slavery...was a crime against humanity. Millions of Africans were brutalized, murdered, raped and tortured. They were torn from their families in Africa, kidnapped and lost family and community associations. African peoples in the United States and the prior colonies were denied the right to maintain their language, spiritual practices and normal family relations, always under the threat of being torn from newly created families at the whim of the "slave owner." Chattel slavery lasted officially from 1619 to 1865. It was followed by 100 years of government led and supported denial of equal and humane treatment including Black Codes, convict lease, sharecropping, peonage, and Jim Crow practices of separate and unequal accommodations. African descendants continue to be denied rights of self-determination, inheritance, and full participation in the United States government and society.

People have been discussing the idea of reparations ever since the Reconstruction era. In an August 27, 2001 report for National Public Radio (link is external), Cheryl Corley, discussed the historical background of the call for reparations:

The U.S. government's first reparations plan to compensate African-Americans for the legacy of slavery was 40 acres and a mule apiece -- that was Gen. William Sherman's promise to former slaves shortly after the Civil War ended in 1865. His order set aside land on the Georgia and South Carolina coasts for the settlement of thousands of newly freed families. But the promise was quickly recanted and the land was taken back, with no other plans for reparations.

Since then, the issue has been revisited time and again by leading civil rights activists. In 1963, for example, Martin Luther King Jr., called Sherman's promise "a check which has come back marked 'insufficient funds.'" King called instead for "a check that will give (African-Americans) upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice."

Support from the White House and Congress still remains weak: ...U.S. Rep. John Conyers' proposal to set up a commission to study the impact of slavery has languished for over a decade.

But the movement has been gaining momentum elsewhere, most notably in the courts. There is now an increased focus on getting compensation from corporations that once profited from slavery. And a major legal battle may be waged early next year when a group of Harvard University professors plans to file a class action lawsuit to seek restitution.

The supporters of reparations face many hurdles, however. Critics say it will be difficult to determine plaintiffs and defendants, arguing that non-black Americans living today are not responsible for slavery and that their tax dollars should not be used for compensation.

In recent decades, reparations has often been seen as a fringe issue. Each year, Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) re-introduces a bill to fund a “Commission to Study Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act.” But each year the bill stalls in Congress. According to a HuffPost/YouGov poll (link is external), 59 percent of black Americans think that the descendants of enslaved Africans deserve reparations. The poll found that only 6 percent of white Americans support cash payments to the descendants of enslaved Africans, while 19 percent would favor reparations in the form of education and jobs programs.

In 2014, the cause of reparations received a significant boost when journalist Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote an essay in a national magazine, The Atlantic (link is external), which received significant attention. In the essay Coates makes the point that white supremacy is not just ancient history. Rather, throughout the twentieth century, blacks were largely excluded from government benefits that allowed for the growth of a solid middle class in the United States. Coates wrote:

The New Deal is today remembered as a model for what progressive government should do—cast a broad social safety net that protects the poor and the afflicted while building the middle class. When progressives wish to express their disappointment with Barack Obama, they point to the accomplishments of Franklin Roosevelt. But these progressives rarely note that Roosevelt’s New Deal, much like the democracy that produced it, rested on the foundation of Jim Crow.

“The Jim Crow South,” writes Ira Katznelson, a history and political science professor at Columbia, “was the one collaborator America’s democracy could not do without.” The marks of that collaboration are all over the New Deal. The omnibus programs passed under the Social Security Act in 1935 were crafted in such a way as to protect the southern way of life. Old-age insurance (Social Security proper) and unemployment insurance excluded farmworkers and domestics—jobs heavily occupied by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed Social Security into law in 1935, 65 percent of African Americans nationally and between 70 and 80 percent in the South were ineligible. The NAACP protested, calling the new American safety net “a sieve with holes just big enough for the majority of Negroes to fall through.”

The oft-celebrated G.I. Bill similarly failed black Americans, by mirroring the broader country’s insistence on a racist housing policy. Though ostensibly color-blind, Title III of the bill, which aimed to give veterans access to low-interest home loans, left black veterans to tangle with white officials at their local Veterans Administration as well as with the same banks that had, for years, refused to grant mortgages to blacks. The historian Kathleen J. Frydl observes in her 2009 book, the GI Bill, that so many blacks were disqualified from receiving Title III benefits “that it is more accurate simply to say that blacks could not use this particular title.”

While the political viability of reparations for black Americans continues to be debated, there can be little question that the legacies of slavery and racism have had a profound effect on the development of American society and on the lives of African Americans, and all Americans, living today.

Download 10.17 Kb.

Share with your friends:

The database is protected by copyright © 2020
send message

    Main page