Plymouth University Academic Partnerships cornwall college(camborne) Programme Quality Handbook

Download 0.49 Mb.
Size0.49 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6

Referencing Guides

  1. Assessment Schedules and Feedback

Each Programme has a designated Moodle page which houses further details of each of the modules contained with a programme. A full assessment schedule will be available via Moodle. Any changes made to the schedule will be done in consultation with the student body and will be fully communicated to the students that are affected. We have now moved to an electronic submission system. All of your assignments and project work will be submitted through Moodle and will be marked anonymously. Once it has been marked your work and feedback will be returned to you through Moodle.







Coursework Type

Coursework Type

Coursework Type

Practical Type

Practical Type

Level 6

CORC329 Research Methods

Examination 50%

Test 20%

Research Plan 30%

EIA35 Geographical Information Systems and Environmental Impact Assessment

Examination 50%

Assignment 50%

ERM303 Project

Honours Project 100%

Students select 2 of the following modules

CORC330 Wildlife Crime

Test 40%

Report 60%

CORC331 Environmental Investigation

Test 40%

Report 60%

CORC332 Environmental Sustainability and Economics

Test 40%

Coursework 60%

CORC333 Environmental Strategy and Marketing

Test 40%

Coursework 60%

Marking stage

Student submits work / sits test / sits examination

Work collated & passed to

Module Leader

Work is marked by Module Leader

Marks collated by Module Leader & submitted to Programme Manager

Internal moderation stage

Students receive initial UNCONFIRMED mark

Internal moderation sample selected1.

Moderation by second academic

Unconfirmed mark & feedback back to students within 20 working days

Marks collated by Module Leader & submitted to Programme Manager

External moderation stage

External moderation samples selected and moderated by External Examiners

Marks collated by Module Leader & submitted to Programme Manager

Subject Assessment Panel (SAP) (ratification) stage

CONFIRMED marks issued to students

Marks approved by SAP and forwarded to College Award Assessment Board

Marks submitted to SAP for consideration and approval

Marks collated by Module Leader & submitted to Programme Manager

1The sample for the internal moderation comprises 20% or 10 assessment pieces minimum. The sample should include a range of assessment pieces including borderlines and fails. For more guidance see the Plymouth University Marking and Moderation policy 2015
  1. Student Feedback

    1. Student Representation and Enhancement

Student representation for each stage of the programme is made through programme committee membership, which should also reflect on enhancement activities and their impact and sustainability. Furthermore, programme committee meetings are not considered quorate without student representation.

Information for students on the importance of course representation has been developed in partnership with the students along with the course representation cycle. Other useful resources are available within the UPSU partner college pages.

In addition to student presence through programme committee membership, it is noted that students also have representation though the Student Unions of both institutions.

    1. Student Perception Surveys

The National Student Survey (NSS) and Plymouth University’s Student Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) offer the opportunity for the Student Voice to be gathered from students individually. Additionally, there may be local methods for collating survey feedback on individual modules.

Student Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) and National Student Survey (NSS)

All students on Plymouth University courses in partner colleges are given the opportunity to complete a questionnaire (SPQ) between January and March in the first year of their programmes. The questionnaire is arranged under a range of headings, the answers to which give us student views on how effectively we support their learning experience, these include teaching, assessment and feedback, academic support, learning resources, personal development opportunities. Student responses are used only in statistical form to produce a subject level report and to enable comparative data to be prepared at faculty level.

In addition students are asked to participate in the National Student Survey (NSS) at the end of their programme. Both of these provide valuable information to enable staff to improve programmes and the learning experience.

What is the Student Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) and what is it for?

  • to give students the chance to tell us what they feel about their experience of teaching and learning at the Cornwall College

  • to allow us to identify those issues that are perceived by students as affecting their education, either positively or negatively

  • to provide us with a University-wide perspective and to enable staff to prioritise our actions to improve the quality of the educational experience at Cornwall College

What does the survey achieve?

At subject level you can expect the findings of the SPQ to be discussed at staff-student liaison groups and Programme Committee Meetings within the college. A related Action Plan is prepared to address students' concerns and this is in turn linked to the University’s Quality Assurance process, addressed through formal meetings between the University and the college. The Director of Higher Education (HE) will review the questionnaire results with senior managers and programme teams as appropriate.

What is the National Student Survey (NSS) and what does it mean to me?

This national survey is designed to provide information on how universities support the student learning experience. It provides vital information to prospective students and their advisers to help them make an informed choice on what they want to study and where they should study it. The results are shown on the national Unistats website (

The survey is an important tool, both at national level and within the University – it is seeking to capture an overall view of the student experience and the results reflect upon the standing and esteem in which the University is held; it is not the tool to use to offer feedback on local course issues which should be directed as normal through course representatives, tutors, lecturers and the Students Union. The University’s own institutional student perception questionnaire will not be issued to students involved in the national survey to avoid burdening students with too many questionnaires. We will therefore rely heavily on the NSS to secure feedback about the overall student experience.

The survey is carried out by Ipsos MORI, an independent company. It will take the form of a short online questionnaire that should only take around 5 minutes to complete. All eligible final year students will be contacted and invited to complete the survey. So that Ipsos MORI can carry out the survey, the University has been asked to provide contact details for students from its current records (this includes all contact details held by the University, including personal phone numbers). The personal data will not be used for any other purpose than the survey, and will not be passed on to any other parties/companies. All the answers will be kept confidential, with results being published in subject groupings.

    1. Closing the Feedback Loop

This includes programme committee feedback through the student representatives as well as other methods for feeding back on the Student Voice.

For information, please see:,-we-did!.aspx).

Cornwall College has developed a student engagement framework which documents the student involvement into quality mechanisms and ensures that feedback on student concerns is delivered in a constructive way and can be demonstrated within the programme action plan. On some campus sites student representatives are governors or on the management committee, and feedback through Student Representatives meetings.

    1. Programme Committee Meetings (PCM)

PCMs exist to enable the core programme team and student representatives to meet formally to strict agendas twice per year. These meetings are in addition to hosting the ALP’s and the EE’s visits, although they may be arranged to align. These meetings are held twice per academic year; autumn and spring. The meeting utilises the standard Plymouth University agenda for each relevant meeting. It is vital that Student Representatives from each academic year of the programme attend the meeting. It is chaired by the Programme Manager; with attendance from module leaders; learning centre staff and HE Operations.
    1. Complaints

The College wants to ensure that its courses and its case of students are of a high quality. However, sometimes things may go wrong and you may want to complain. If this becomes the case then please follow the link below for further details.

If after reviewing the procedure you are unsure of what action you would like to take or require further advice and guidance then please use the following:


    1. Extenuating Circumstances

Extenuating Circumstances is a policy to ensure that no student is disadvantaged by circumstances beyond their control; whilst maintaining academic standards. These are circumstances which:

  • affect your ability to attend or complete assessment(s)

  • are exceptional

  • are outside your control

  • can be corroborated by independent evidence

  • occurred during or shortly before the assessment in question

If your participation in an examination or assessment has been affected by an extenuating circumstance; then you can ask the College to take this info consideration. You can submit a claim for extenuating circumstances to cover last submission of work, no-submission of work or non-attendance at a time specific assessment; such as an examination, test, presentation or performance or a field class.

When making a claim, students must ensure that they submit the FULLY completed Extenuating Circumstances form along with the relevant associated evidence as soon as possible, and normally no later than ten working days after the deadline for the submission of the work; or the date of the presentation, performance or test. If you are making an extenuating circumstances claim about coursework, do not wait for a decision on your claim before submitting your work. Please submit the final version of your work within 10 working days of the original deadline. However it would be preferred if the claim was submitted within 5 days in order that it can be dealt with quickly and within the timeframe.

For full details of the Extenuating Circumstances Policy please follow the link below:

If you have any queries regarding the submission of the Extenuating Circumstances please speak with your Programme Manager or a member of the HE Operations Team.

  1. Download 0.49 Mb.

    Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6

The database is protected by copyright © 2022
send message

    Main page