KARL POPPER Sir KARL POPPER 1902-1994 - Hume is right: we
- never get beyond
- conjectures.
- “Darwinian” view
- of human
- “knowledge”:
- PS1TT1
- EE1PS2…
PROBLEM OF THE CRITERION (264, theme of whole essay) - Problem: what distinguishes science from non-science or pseudo-science?
- Lots of theories in political “science” (e.g., Marx, Spengler, Nazism), psychoanalysis (Freud, Adler, Jung), claim to be scientific.
- ARE THEY?
- Popper’s experience in Adler’s clinic (p. 265).
- Everything is consistent with, hence
- corroborates or confirms his theory.
NONSCIENTIFIC THEORY - Marx, Spengler, Hitler, Freud, Adler:
- Everything confirms their theories, nothing falsifies them.
- N.B.: not just every actual thing, but every conceivable thing.
- NON-SCIENCE IS UNFALSIFIABLE.
SCIENTIFIC THEORY - Newton, Einstein: most conceivable things falsify their theories:
- N.B.: though no actual thing does
- Example: A body has to fall (orbit, etc.) with a precise acceleration (velocity, etc), or else theory is false.
- N.B.: though in fact theory is not
- falsified.
PROBLEM OF THE CRITERION - Observation: Marx’s, Freud’s, Adler’s, etc., theories take no risk, but Einstein’s is risky (= falsifiable).
- So, maybe:
- Falsifiability is the criterion of science
FALSIFIABILITY 1 (P’s summary of numbered list, p. 266) - Popper accepts above solution:
- Falsifiability is the criterion of science
- Falsifiability =DEF the logical possibility of being proven false by observation =DEF can conceive of such proof without self-contradiction
FALSIFIABILITY 2 - Falsification of scientific claim is logically valid:
- T O
- ~ O_____
- Thus ~ T
- T=Theory is true
- O=Observation implied by theory occurs.
- [Recall Salmon, invalidity of scientific confirmation: T O; O; Thus T.]
FALSIFIABILITY [3] - Falsifiable or not?
- a) Unicorns do not exist.
- Assume: unicorns are not invisible
- b) Unicorns exist.
- c) 3 x 7 = 21
- d) Hitler never once wore mismatched socks.
- e) Dinosaurs once roamed the Earth
SCIENTIFIC THEORIES ARE PROHIBITIONS - [explanation of Popper’s item #3, p. 266]
- In a state of perfect ignorance, all things are possible so far as we can tell.
- E.g., F=ma or F=2ma or F=3ma or…
- Knowledge rules out some possibilities
- OR: scientific theories are constrained
- by observational data
- [explanation of Popper’s item #5, p. 266]
- “Genuine test” is defined in terms of attempts to falsify.
- Theories can be protected from the evidence by qualifications, promises, etc.
- E.g.: Is the theory of global warming
- falsified by the years of cooling?
POPPER’S “SOLUTION” OF HUME’S PROBLEM OF INDUCTION - i) Deduction is the only logic; there is no inductive logic.
- ii) Theory of rationality: accept boldest unfalsified falsifiable theory
- bold=risky=high content
- Timid: the robin will fly south in the fall
- Bold: the robin will fly south on 26 Oct.
- Bolder: …26 Oct. at 1:23 p.m., SSW,…
Share with your friends: |