This research was supported in part by the Institute for Education Sciences (IES R305A080589 and IES R305G20018-02). Ideas expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IES.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). A second look at T-unit analysis: Reconsidering the sentence. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 390-395.
Biber, D. (1985). Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multi-feature/
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45 (1), 5-35.
Casanave, C. (1994). Language development in students’ journals. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 3, 179–201. doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90016-7.
Charniak, E. (2000). A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. Proceedings of the First
Conference on North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 132-139). San Francisco: Morgan Kauffmann.
Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international student persuasive writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 2 (4), 67-87.
Connor-Linton, J. & Polio, C. (2014) Introduction: Comparing Perspectives on L2 Writing: Multiple Analyses of a Common Corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, X:Y, x-y..
Crossley, S. A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42 (3), 475-493.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The role of cohesion, readability, and lexical difficulty. Journal of Research in Reading, 35 (2), 115-135.
Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., McNamara, D. S., & Graesser, A. (2011) Predicting human scores of essay quality using computational indices of linguistic and textual features. In G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, and A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. (pp. 438-440). New York: Springer.
Crossley, S. A., Weston, J., McLain Sullivan, S. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). The development of writing proficiency as a function of grade level: A linguistic analysis. Written Communication, 28 (3), 282-311.
Eckman, F., Moravcsik, E., & Wirth, J. (1989). Implicational universals and interrogative
structures in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Language Learning, 39, 173-205.
Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Cox, B. (2006). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 247–273. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3803_1.
Ferris, D. R. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 414–420. doi:10.2307/3587446.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18 (3), 299-323.
Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29 (2), 327-344.
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M. & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193–202.
Grant, L. & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 123–145.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford, England: Oxford
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London, England: Cassell.
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hempelmann, C.F., Rus V., Graesser, A.C., & McNamara, D.S. (2006). Evaluating state-of-the-art treebank-style parsers for Coh-Metrix and other learning technology environments. Natural Language Engineering, 12, 131-144
Henry, K. (1996). Early L2 writing development: A study of autobiographical essays
by university-level students of Russian. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 309–326. doi:10.2307/329438.
Higgins, D., Xi, X., Zechner, K., & Williamson, D. (2011). A three-stage approach to the automated scoring of spontaneous spoken responses. Computer Speech and Language, 25 (2), 282-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2010.06.001
Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels. Research
Report No. 3. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing.
Journal of Second Language Writing, 4 (1), 51-69.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1978). An ESL index of development. TESOL Quarterly, 12,
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15 (4), 474-496
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45 (1), 36-62.
McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57-86. doi:10.1177/0741088309351547
McNamara, D., & Graesser, A. (2012). Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoretical and applied natural language processing. In P. M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum (Eds.), Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2
proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518. doi:10.1093/applin/24.4.492.
Reppen, R. (1994). Variation in elementary student language: A multi-dimensional perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
Schumann, J. H. (1979). The acquisition of English negation by speakers of Spanish: A review of the literature. R. W. Andersen (Ed.), In The acquisition and use of Spanish and English as first and second languages. (pp. 3-32). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Selinker, L., Swain, M., & Dumas, G. (1975). The interlanguage hypothesis extended to children. Language Learning, 25, 139-152.
Stockwell, G., & Harrington, M. (2003). The incidental development of L2 proficiency in NS-NNS email interactions. CALICO Journal, 20, 337–359.
Street, J. H. (1971). Readability of UCLA materials used for foreign students. Unpublished M.A. thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.
Wells, R. (1960). Nominal and verbal style. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language
(pp. 213–220). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
White, L. (1996). Clitics in child L2 French. In H. Clahsen (Ed.) Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations and crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 335-368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Witten, I. A., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011). Data Mining. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second Language Development in
Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Within subjects ANOVA: Differences between beginning and end of semester
1st essay mean (SD)
3rd essay mean (SD)
Incidence of all clauses (matrix, coordinating, and embedded clauses)