Expert Working Group Report


Theme 3. Indigenous priorities



Download 124.23 Kb.
Page8/14
Date09.08.2018
Size124.23 Kb.
TypeReport
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   14

Theme 3. Indigenous priorities

Recommendation 5


Enable Indigenous communities to develop local and regional priorities for science engagement, research and communication.

Recommendation 6


Provide Indigenous communities with the scientific resources to build community capacity to deliver on local community priorities.

Recommendation 7


That, in developing their science engagement and research agendas, government, researchers and their organisations ensure:

  • local and regional Indigenous priorities are integrated into the development of their projects;

  • the meaningful participation and empowerment of local Indigenous knowledge holders in project design, delivery and evaluation; and

  • project outcomes deliver clear and sustainable benefits to the livelihood of local communities.

Recommendation 8


That governments, researchers, communicators and their organisations have research 'impact measures' that include priorities and outcomes for local Indigenous communities.

Reasoning


Indigenous communities are interested in science and in working collaboratively with scientists across Western and Indigenous knowledge domains. For example, Indigenous land and sea management, in particular, is a growth area in which the demand for scientific knowledge, tools and expertise is increasing. To meet this demand and to enhance scientific and community outcomes, initiatives are needed to increase the placement of scientists within Indigenous organisations such as land and sea management organisations.

Similarly, Indigenous land and sea managers are pursuing access to research funding and research partnerships in order to secure scientific expertise. Indigenous perceptions of the value of science are greatly enhanced in programs where there is a dedicated effort by research organisations to ensure Indigenous participation in decision making about research design, conduct and outcomes, and to create post-hoc evaluation frameworks that consider benefits to Indigenous peoples.

Consequently, it is important for communities to have a clear understanding of what their local priorities for science are. To ensure these are both clarified and captured in research projects, project activities need to be developed in local settings and designed in ways that ensure local knowledge and expertise will be both embraced and improved. This should engender community-wide science engagement and will also equip community members to better interact with and participate in those research activities.

It is important that the benefits for Indigenous people from scientific research activities are assessable. This means developing assessment criteria, evaluation mechanisms and longitudinal studies to fully measure the impact of research outcomes and their value to particular communities. Project grants must therefore provide for measures to identify and quantify benefits, and to report these to the communities involved. However, while there is some requirement for such accountability measures in various research grants, there are seldom any real compliance checks. If done, these rarely consider Indigenous viewpoints. The longevity of some projects (over five years) makes it difficult for Indigenous communities, often located in remote areas, to maintain oversight and control of research processes and outcomes.

Further, research and development projects receiving finance from sources other than research grant providers are often funded on the basis of 'return on investment'. In such projects it is important to ensure that Indigenous community and cultural development are properly valued as valid returns, and this should be articulated in terms of 'science impact areas' and research expectations. Too often, research outputs that are of value to Indigenous communities but that don't fit narrow assessment criteria (e.g. a focus on conventional peer-reviewed articles) are undervalued in existing science 'impact' assessments. In reviewing 'impact measures' consideration of the benefit/impact/success to Indigenous communities should be taken into account.

Theme 4. Communication

Recommendation 9


Develop an Indigenous media and communication strategy to engage Indigenous people in science, to inform the wider community about Indigenous science achievement, and to create a new appreciation of the value of Indigenous knowledge systems amongst the Indigenous and broader scientific communities.

Resourcing


  • One full-time person to develop and implement the strategy.

  • Funds for communication activities.

Reasoning


The Inspiring Australia report states (p. xiii), 'If the communication of science is to be effective it needs to recognise the audiences to be engaged.' This is particularly true for Indigenous peoples. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities are diverse communities, with a significant proportion of Indigenous people living in remote and very remote areas with limited access to the range of media available in larger urban areas.

Indigenous media is a thriving and important means of communication for Indigenous peoples and includes national newspapers such as the Koori Mail, the National Indigenous Times and Land Rights News, and Indigenous radio stations in most capital cities, in regional areas and in remote communities, broadcasting in English and in local Indigenous languages.

While there are stories about Indigenous engagement in science across mainstream and Indigenous media, in many cases these are not explicitly identified or perceived as stories about 'science' but more often seen as having a cultural or community interest focus. The broader Australian community needs to become more informed about Indigenous achievements in science and the relationship between Indigenous knowledge and science, and some thought and research needs to be focused on how this is best achieved.

The development of Indigenous-specific awards within Australia's premier science awards may be an important means to recognise and highlight Indigenous knowledge and scientific achievement (see also Recommendation 11).


Recommendation 10


Develop and sponsor science awards to recognise and profile Indigenous achievements in science. This should include:

  • awards for young Indigenous scientists, Indigenous knowledge holders and communities

  • Indigenous categories within Australia's prestigious national and state science awards

  • science as a category within the Deadly Awards and other relevant Indigenous awards.

Reasoning


National and state awards recognising Indigenous scientific achievements will bring these to the attention of the wider Australian community, challenging long held assumptions and stereotypes as well as providing important role models for Indigenous young people. Indigenous science categories should be included in all major awards, such as the Eureka prizes, and recognise a diverse range of scientific achievements by individuals and communities as well as programs that provide pathways into science courses for Indigenous secondary students.

The Deadly Awards are national Indigenous awards that include a number of categories such as Arts, Sport, Music and Community (including Education). There is currently no specific category for Science. Development of awards in this category would be an important step in communicating the science message to Indigenous communities and young people.



Download 124.23 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   14




The database is protected by copyright ©sckool.org 2020
send message

    Main page