Alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, bargaining, best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA), collective bargaining, collective action, conciliation, game theory and negotiation theory.
Forgas, J. P. (1998) "On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and behavior". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 565–577.
Van Kleef, G.A., De Dreu, C.KW., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2006) "Supplication and Appeasement in Conflict and Negotiation: The Interpersonal Effects of Disappointment, Worry, Guilt, and Regret". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 124–142
Butt AN, Choi JN, Jaeger A (2005) "The effects of self-emotion, counterpart emotion, and counterpart behavior on negotiator behavior: a comparison of individual-level and dyad-level dynamics". Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(6), 681 - 704
Kramer, R. M., Newton, E. & Pommerenke, P. L. (1993) "Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment: Effects of self-esteem and mood". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 110-133.
Maiese, Michelle “Emotions” Beyond Intractability. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: July 2005 downloaded: 30.08.2007
Carnevale, P. J. D. & Isen, A. M. (1986) “ The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access On the Discovery Of Negative Solutions In Bilateral Negotiation”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1-13.
Barry, B., Fulmer, I. S., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2004) I laughed, I cried, I settled: The role of emotion in negotiation. In M. J. Gelfand & J. M. Brett (Eds.), The handbook of negotiation and culture (pp. 71–94). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Allred, K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F., & Raia, C. P. (1997) "The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 175–187.
Davidson, M. N., & Greenhalgh, L. (1999) "The role of emotion in negotiation: The impact of anger and race". Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 7, 3–26.
Albarracin D. & Kumkale, G.T. (2003) "Affect as Information in Persuasion: A Model of Affect Identification and Discounting". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3) 453-469.
Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). “ The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 57–76.
Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000) "Negotiation". Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279–314.
References and further reading
William Hernandez Requejo & John L Graham, Global Negotiation: The New Rules, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, ISBN 1-4039-8493-X
Ronald M. Shapiro and Mark A. Jankowski, The Power of Nice: How To Negotiate So Everyone Wins- Especially You, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998,ISBN 0-471-08072-1
David Lax and James Sebenius,3D Negotiation, Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
Roger Fisher and Daniel Shapiro,Beyond reason: Using Emotions as You Negotiate, Viking/Penguin, 2005.
Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, and Sheila Heen, foreword by Roger Fisher, Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most, Penguin, 1999, ISBN 0-14-028852-X
Catherine Morris, ed.Negotiation in Conflict Transformation and Peacebuilding: A Selected Bibliography. Victoria, Canada: Peacemakers Trust.
Howard Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation, Belknap Press 1982, ISBN 0-674-04812-1
William Ury,Getting Past No: Negotiating Your Way from Confrontation to Cooperation, revised second edition, Bantam, January 1, 1993, trade paperback, ISBN 0-553-37131-2; 1st edition under the title, Getting Past No: Negotiating with Difficult People, Bantam, September, 1991, hardcover, 161 pages, ISBN 0-553-07274-9
William Ury, Roger Fisher and Bruce Patton, Getting To yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in, Revised 2nd edition, Penguin USA, 1991, trade paperback, ISBN 0-14-015735-2; Houghton Mifflin, April, 1992, hardcover, 200 pages, ISBN 0-395-63124-6. The first edition, unrevised, Houghton Mifflin, 1981, hardcover, ISBN 0-395-31757-6
Leigh L. Thompson, The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator, Prentice Hall 0ct.2000, ISBN 0-13-017964-7
Nicolas Iynedjian, Négociation - Guide pratique, CEDIDAC 62, Lausanne 2005, ISBN 2-88197-061-3
Michele J. Gelfand and Jeanne M. Brett, ed “Handbook of negotiation and culture”, 2004. ISBN 0804745862
Emotion and Conflict from the ‘’Beyond Intractability’’ Database
Gerard I. Nierenberg, The Art of Negotiating: Psychological Strategies for Gaining Advantageous Bargains, Barnes and Noble, (1995), hardcover, 195 pages, ISBN 1-56619-816-X
Andrea Schneider & Christopher Honeyman, eds., The Negotiator's Fieldbook, American Bar Association (2006).
Conflict is a state of discord caused by the actual or perceived opposition of needs, values and interests. A conflict can be internal (within oneself) or external (between two or more individuals). Conflict as a concept can help explain many aspects of social life, such as social disagreement, conflicts of interests, and fight between individuals, groups, or organizations. In political terms, "conflict" can refer to wars, revolutions or other struggles, which may involve the use of force as in the term armed conflict. Without proper social arrangement or resolution, conflicts in social settings can result in stress or tensions among stakeholders.
Conflict as taught for graduate and professional work in conflict resolution commonly has the definition: "when two or more parties, with perceived incompatible goals, seek to undermine each other's goal-seeking capability".One should not confuse the distinction between the presence and absence of conflict with the difference between competition and co-operation. In competitive situations, the two or more individuals or parties each have mutually inconsistent goals, either party tries to reach their goal it will undermine the attempts of the other to reach theirs. Therefore, competitive situations will, by their nature, cause conflict. However, conflict can also occur in cooperative situations, in which two or more individuals or parties have consistent goals, because the manner in which one party tries to reach their goal can still undermine the other individual or party.
A clash of interests, values, actions or directions often sparks a conflict. Conflicts refer to the existence of that clash. Psychologically, a conflict exists when the reduction of one motivating stimulus involves an increase in another, so that a new adjustment is demanded. The word is applicable from the instant that the clash occurs. Even when we say that there is a potential conflict we are implying that there is already a conflict of direction even though a clash may not yet have occurred.
Types and Modes of Conflict
A conceptual conflict can escalate into a verbal exchange and/or result in fighting.
Conflict can exist at a variety of levels of analysis:
intrapersonal conflict (though this usually just gets delegated out topsychology)
religious-based conflict (for example: Centre fro reduction of religious based conflict)
Conflicts in these levels may appear "nested" in conflicts residing at larger levels of analysis. For example, conflict within a work team may play out the dynamics of a broader conflict in the organization as a whole. (See Marie Dugan’s's article on Nested Conflict.John Paul Lederach has also written on this.) Theorists have claimed that parties can conceptualize responses to conflict according to a two-dimensional scheme; concern for one's own outcomes and concern for the outcomes of the other party. This scheme leads to the following hypotheses:
High concern for both one's own and the other party's outcomes leads to attempts to find mutually beneficial solutions.
High concern for one's own outcomes only leads to attempts to "win" the conflict.
High concern for the other party's outcomes only leads to allowing the other to "win" the conflict.
No concern for either side's outcomes leads to attempts to avoid the conflict.
In western society, practitioners usually suggest that attempts to find mutually beneficial solutions lead to the most satisfactory outcomes, but this may not hold true for many Asian societies. Several theorists detect successive phases in the development of conflicts.Often a group finds itself in conflict overfacts, goals, methods or values. It is critical that it properly identify the type of conflict it is experiencing if it hopes to manage the conflict through to resolution. For example, a group will often treat an assumption as a fact.The more difficult type of conflict is when values are the root cause. It is more likely that a conflict over facts, or assumptions, will be resolved than one over values. It is extremely difficult to "prove" that a value is "right" or "correct". In some instances, a group will benefit from the use of a facilitator or process conslutant to help identify the specific type of conflict. Practitioners of non violence have developed many practices to solve social and political conflicts without resorting to violence or coercion.
Conflict can arise between several characters and there can be more than one in a story or plot line. The little plot lines usually enhance the main conflict.
Approach Avoidance Conflict is an example of intrapersonal conflict.
The Vietnam Conflict is commonly regarded as a war.
The Arab-Israeli conflict forms a historic and ongoing conflict between Israel and Arab interests. The Catholic-Protestant conflict in Northern Ireland furnishes an example of another notable historic conflict. Many conflicts have a supposedly racial or ethnic basis. This would include such conflicts as the Bosnian-Croatian conflict, the conflict in.
An example of ideological conflict is the struggle over slavery between the North and South. The dispute would eventually lead to secession.
Class conflict forms an important topic in much Marxist thought.
Another type of conflict exists between governments and guerilla groups or groups engaged in asymetirc warfare.
Causes of Conflict
Structural Factors (How the conflict is set up)
Specialisation (The experts in fields)
Interdependcence (A company as a whole can't operate w/o other departments)
Common resources (Sharing the same secretary)
Goal Differences (One person wants production to rise and others want communication to rise)
Authority Relationships (The boss and employees beneath him/her)
Jurisdicational Ambiguities (Who can discipline whom)
Skills and Abilities
Conflict management style
Values and ethics
The assertion that "conflict is emotionally defined and driven," and "does not exist in the absence of emotion" is challenged by Economics, e.g. "the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses. In this context, scarcity means that available resources are insufficient to satisfy all wants and needs. The subject of conflict as a purely rational, strategic decision is specifically addressed by Game theory, a branch of Economics.
Where applicable, there are many components to the emotions that are intertwined with conflict. There is a behavioral, physiological, cognitive component.
Behavioral- The way emotional experience gets expressed which can be verbal or non-verbal and intentional or un-intentional.
Physiological- The bodily experience of emotion. The way emotions make us feel in comparison to our identity.
Cognitive- The idea that we “assess or appraise” an event to reveal its relevancy to ourselves.
These three components collectively advise that “the meanings of emotional experience and expression are determined by cultural values, beliefs, and practices.”
Cultural values- culture tells people who are a part of it, “Which emotions ought to be expressed in particular situations” and “what emotions are to be felt.”
Physical- This escalation results from “anger or frustration.”
Verbal- This escalation results from “negative perceptions of the annoyer’s character.”
There are several principles of conflict and emotion.
Conflict is emotionally defined-conflict involves emotion because something “triggers” it. The conflict is with the parties involved and how they decide to resolve it — “events that trigger conflict are events that elicit emotion.”
Conflict is emotionally valenced — emotion levels during conflict can be intense or less intense. The “intensity” levels “may be indicative of the importance and meaning of the conflict issues for each” party.
Conflict Invokes a moral stance — when an event occurs it can be interpreted as moral or immoral. The judging of this morality “influences one’s orientation to the conflict, relationship to the parties involved, and the conflict issues”.
Conflict is identity based — Emotions and Identity are a part of conflict. When a person knows their values, beliefs, and morals they are able to determine whether the conflict is personal, relevant, and moral. “Identity related conflicts are potentially more destructive.”
Conflict is relational — “conflict is relational in the sense that emotional communication conveys relational definitions that impact conflict.” “Key relational elements are power and social status.”
Emotions are acceptable in the workplace as long as they can be controlled and utilized for productive organizational outcomes.
Ways of addressing conflict
Five basic ways of addressing conflict were identified by Thomas and Kilman in 1976
Avoidance– avoid or postpone conflict by ignoring it, changing the subject, etc. Avoidance can be useful as a temporary measure to buy time or as an expedient means of dealing with very minor, non-recurring conflicts. In more severe cases, conflict avoidance can involve severing a relationship or leaving a group.
Collaboration – work together to find a mutually beneficial solution. While the Thomas Kilman grid views collaboration as the only win-win solution to conflict, collaboration can also be time-intensive and inappropriate when there is not enough trust, respect or communication among participants for collaboration to occur.
Compromise – find a middle ground in which each party is partially satisfied.
Competition – assert one's viewpoint at the potential expense of another. It can be useful when achieving one's objectives outweighs one's concern for the relationship.
Accommodation – surrender one's own needs and wishes to accommodate the other party.
The Thomas Kilman Instrument can be used to assess one's dominant style for addressing conflict.
Many NGOs and independent groups attempt to monitor the situation of ongoing conflicts. Unfortunately, the definitions of war, conflict, armed struggle, revolution and all these words which describe violent opposition between States or armed organised groups, are not precise enough to distinguish one from another. For example, the word terrorism is used indifferently by many governments to delegitimate every kind of armed revolt and, at the same time, by many rebel groups to delegitimate the armed repression of sovereign governments.
Resolving Workplace Conflict, Colorado University.
Five Problem Solving Methods
Managing Conflict within or between Groups, Timor Australia Friendship Manual.