resort to violence. Its very existence means loss of control, a maddening prospect for those obsessed with control. The prenatal child:
- Cannot be negotiated with
- Cannot be deterred
- Cannot be appeased
- Cannot be threatened
- Cannot be embargoed
- Cannot be held hostage
- Cannot be imprisoned
- Cannot be stayed from being born, its natural destiny, by any non-violent means
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
- The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Dr. King devoted his life to opposing the choice to discriminate on the basis of race
Exactly one week after his January 15th birthday, 7 days which should be designated National Hypocrisy Week or National Schizophrenia Week, we observe the January 22nd anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision, which freed us to choose to discriminate fatally on the basis of "wantedness", physical maturity, appearance, sex, health, dependence, sentience, parentage, or any other criterion, including race, if it is done before birth
Are these criteria any less arbitrary or subjective than race?
By what logic shall we choose criteria for excluding others from the protection of the human community?
Would any such exclusion be an act of justice?
What does the acceptance of such criteria for destruction say about the content of our character?
The United States is founded on the philosophical premise that our unalienable human rights are intrinsic with our human lives. This premise, which I choose to call “Intrinsicism,” a single word and descriptive term, allows us to appeal to our Creator over the head of any tyrant or other would-be grantor or denier of our fundamental human rights for their recognition and protection.
This premise has been called our “civic religion.” It is a protective and inclusive philosophy.
All real Americans are Intrinsicists.
The inclusive philosophy of Intrinsicism serves as a wall of separation between freedom and oppression; between civilization and barbarianism. Once this barrier has been breached, all criteria for destruction then compete on an equal basis because they are justified in principle.
Abandoning Intrinsicism can and often does result in carnage. The U.S. has some 58,000,000 ‘disappeared.’
For over 40 years, the Democratic Party has stood in the way of extending any legal protection at all to prenatal children such that the horrific daily slaughter continues.
Rejection of Intrinsicism – The Cult of Abortionism
Rejection of the philosophy of Intrinsicism is the basis of a cult religion that has been at the root of virtually every abuse ever inflicted on human individuals or populations. I call this cult "Abortionism" to clearly associate it with the most egregious violation of human rights in our country and most of the world today. However, its principles apply equally well to nearly every other human rights abuse in world history. Its standard practices are three “abortions” or terminations:
The Three Abortions
All three “Abortions” are evils or sins
Theological Abortion – terminates the authority of God to make the rules – activating principle: human will – fundamental human rights are granted or denied to the powerless by the powerful
Abortionite creed: “My will be done”
Mental Abortion – dehumanize the target individual(s) or population – activating principle: infatuation with human intellect or self-worship – worship of the faculty of reason to eliminate conscience - essential to overcoming the moral obstacles to committing the most egregious violations of other human beings that all human societies prohibit – the Mental Abortion is authorized by the Theological Abortion
The criteria for choice in conducting the Mental Abortion typically make perfect sense to the practicing Abortionite
Physical Abortion – terminates the lives, liberties or property rights of the target population - activating principle: might makes right – anything can be justified against non-persons
A Principle of Conflict Resolution
Attack the problem. It is not you against me; it is you and me against the problem. The problem is the problem. (Recall King’s principles of non-violence, attacking evil and unjust systems, not people.)
The problem is sin.
Our whole culture is part of the problem.
The sexual devolution (to creatures with the moral code of rodents) normalized sexual sin and its consequences.
The “this-world” and hereafter adverse consequences of sin remain unchanged.
The problem starts with the Theological Abortion. Many people now believe they can make their own moral rules.
Moral relativism arises from the Theological Abortion.
Our political, ethical, moral, social and overall cultural environments have been seriously polluted. Major cleanup is necessary but the Democratic agenda stands in the way, dedicated to protecting this pollution as a legitimate expression of freedom.
The Sects of Abortionism
The sects and subsects of this cult are characterized by their criteria for choice in performing the Mental Abortion and are named accordingly: Racist, Sexist, Creedist, Birthist, Classist, Utilitarianist, Functionalist, etc.
Basically, Racist Abortionites and Birthist Abortionites, for example, share the same ugly ideas with other Abortionites. They believe it is up to them -- those who have power -- to grant or deny fundamental human rights to other human beings rather than that such rights are granted to all human beings by God. They differ only in their criteria for the choice of discriminating against others even to the point of rationalizing their destruction.
Challenge those who protest this comparison to explain how they think they are different!
Secular Humanism or Abortionism?
There is nothing secular about secular humanism. Its adherents are devoutly religious, idolatrously and fervently worshiping the idol of their own intellects.
People think that “secular” is good or neutral due to misunderstandings of the purpose of the First Amendment, which are promoted by Democrats. It is a prettified way of saying “atheistic,” a world view that has an abysmal record in human governance. Why cover this up?
“Humanism” sounds like something friendly to humans, which it is not.
Speaking of Abortionite sects allows for easy comparison and linkage of all historical abuses of human rights. Even someone who claims to be for the positive good of “choice” cannot easily avoid the fact that to be for such choice one has to have committed a Mental Abortion on the target population, a characteristic shared by other more obvious abusers. Attention is focused on the only thing at issue: the nature of the choice.
Abortionism demonstrates that the pro-life cause is based on the principles of human rights rather than on religious beliefs.
Abortionism places abortion apologists in a difficult defensive position.
Shaping the Battlespace
Fighting on one’s preferred turf has been recognized as a key advantage in battle for millennia
The battlefield and weapons in this struggle consist of words and ideas
How many people even know there is a correct, scientific term for a pregnant woman, much less what it is?
Language – Fighting on Our Preferred Turf
Refusing to Allow the Mental Abortion
by Communicating in Abortionspeak
The powers that be have seen to it that everyone knows and uses the word fetus, which is the correct, scientific term for what used to be called an unborn baby. This is precisely because it is strange, sterile, cold and dehumanizing. Likewise, the correct, scientific term for a pregnant woman is strange, sterile, cold and dehumanizing. But you will never hear it used outside of scientific circles because it is on no one’s agenda to dehumanize women in order to rationalize destroying them, whereas it is on many people’s agendas to dehumanize unborn babies in order to rationalize destroying them.
The correct, scientific term for a pregnant woman is gravida. It’s from the same root as gravity, meaning “heavy,” as with child.
Challenge opponents as to why they do not use this scientifically correct term while they insist on using “fetus.”
More Problems with Language
Overcoming Abortionspeak, the Language of Denial,
Confusion and Dehumanization
Repro-destructive rites (or “rituals” so as not to be confused with the homonym “rights”)
Viable – able to live in particular environments. This legacy term from the physician’s perspective has been used as though the “ability to live” is a function of medical technology after birth. This usage has suggested to many that the prenatal child is somehow not alive or doesn’t matter when it is perfectly viable in the only environment in which it is adapted to live at the early stages of the human life cycle. Suggested alternatives are intra-uterine viable and extra-uterine viable to make clear that the child is perfectly viable (i.e., able to live) at every stage of its existence and in both environments. Viability at a given stage of development depends on environment, not technology.
See also: http://www.cul.detmich.com/glossary.html
From the 2012 Democratic National Platform:
Protecting A Woman's Right to Choose. The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay. We oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right. Abortion is an intensely personal decision between a woman, her family, her doctor, and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or government to get in the way. We also recognize that health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions. We strongly and unequivocally support a woman's decision to have a child by providing affordable health care and ensuring the availability of and access to programs that help women during pregnancy and after the birth of a child, including caring adoption programs.
What’s missing from this document?
The prenatal child doesn’t even bear mentioning. It has been wiped out of mind by the Mental Abortion such that it does not exist and carries no significance.
The Democratic National Platform is a document written by – and for – psychopaths.
Consider what kind of mind it takes to hold a perfectly formed human baby in one’s hands, its legs kicking while its head is still within its mother, and then puncture its skull and suck its brains out.
Anyone who could do this has first committed a complete Mental Abortion of the prenatal child.
Guess which political party defended this atrocity?
Birthist Abortionite “logic”:
“If you’re against abortion then don’t have one.”
Let’s apply this “logic” to some other human behaviors:
If you’re against slavery then don’t enslave anyone and don’t become enslaved yourself. That will solve the problem, right?
If you’re against rape then don’t rape anyone and don’t get raped yourself. That will solve the problem, right?
If you’re against postnatal murder then don’t murder anyone and don’t get murdered yourself. That will solve the problem, right?
What do these examples have in common?
In each case the primary victim has been mentally aborted and carries no significance in the mind of the person making the argument.
Birthist Abortionite “logic”: Answering the Bodily Autonomy Argument:
“A woman has a right to control her own body”
Our bodies are not autonomous – there are many restrictions on how we use them
The argument can’t be limited to pregnant women, requires support for abortion at every stage of development and argues against any restrictions on a woman’s activities during pregnancy
Abortion isn’t simply “withdrawing support” but active killing
The unborn child is not, in any scientific or medical sense, an intruder or a parasite or a part of the mother. It is where it is supposed to be in the natural order and is biologically not the mother but a separate and unique human individual
If an unborn baby exists at all it is because of the actions of its parents who have thereby become responsible for it regardless of whether its creation was intentional
The Declaration of Apathy, Moral Cowardice and/or Degradation, Intellectual Sloth, Self-Serving Cynicism and Women’s Moral Incompetence: “I Am Pro-Choice”
Apathy – I don’t care if an unborn baby lives or dies or what abortion does to its mother.
Moral Cowardice and/or Degradation – I have conducted a Mental Abortion sufficient to absolve myself of any obligation to defend the most innocent and helpless members of the human family and substituted apathy for compassion. I may also desire to engage in rodentism, the adoption of the moral code of rodents (whereby humans meet, briefly sniff each other out and then have at it) and wish to be able to easily clean up after any mistakes.
Intellectual Sloth – I am passionately devoted to ignorance about the biological facts of life before birth and/or pathologically self-absorbed, regarding the entire subject of abortion as a matter of women controlling their own bodies and nothing else.
Self-Serving Cynicism – I secretly desire many other people to have abortions because I believe it is to my benefit. This is especially true for minorities and Third World people whose numbers threaten my security, lifestyle, tax burden and potential access to resources.
Women’s Moral Incompetence – I believe that women are so fragile and child-like that they cannot possibly be expected to be responsible for their own actions in becoming pregnant and must be allowed this deadly way out. Even in the case of forced pregnancy, women cannot be expected to handle adversity for the benefit of the common good (as men can to secure our freedoms) by making sacrifices to secure the integrity of the ethic of the sanctity of human life.
The Pontius Pilate Posture
A Favorite Ploy of Democrat Politicians
“I’m personally opposed to private executions of the known innocent but willing to assist in them (by providing taxpayer funding) because I believe it is to my political advantage”
Orwellian Aspects of the Democrats’ Agenda
Orwell’s totalitarian party in 1984 had several slogans:
War Is Peace - expresses the reverence for and sanctification of violence and the unlawful exercise of government power to accomplish their peaceful, utopian vision, regarded as so beneficial that working toward it would constitute peace in spite of the work itself consisting of violent acts.
Freedom Is Slavery - expresses contempt for genuine, individually responsible development and exercise of conscience - the freedom to modify one's behavior to follow traditional ethical principles such as reverence for life, even at some personal cost, is regarded as slavery to antiquated, sentimental and oppressive ideas which are in conflict with the Democrats’ distorted concept of freedom
Ignorance Is Strength – the strength of the Democrat agenda depends on ignorance to justify their many wars – the slogan expresses contempt for knowledge of opposing legal, moral and ethical principles and humanizing facts about the target populations
Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past – with overwhelming control of the present in the media, the arts and academia, the Democrats have significant control of the past to shape the future
Four legs good! Two legs bad! – Democrats try to intimidate and overwhelm opponents like the pigs in Orwell’s Animal Farm who stomped their feet and chanted in unison – so much for birthers, deniers and tenthers!
Control of the Present
The leftstream media, the propaganda arm of the so-called “Democrats,” savaged the rescue movement as “mob rule” and trumpeted the handful of murders of abortionists and their staffs, while the politically correct civil rights movement was unfailingly portrayed as heroic and the far more common murders of pro-life people, usually women resisting coercion to abort, was completely ignored.
The right to life movement responded to the intimidation with foot-shuffling apologies and tried to distance itself from the rescuers while the daily violence of abortion continued. The movement has retreated into a defensive posture.
Imagine for a moment how the media would react if any pro-life organization or prominent individual even once adopted a threatening slogan like “No Justice; No Peace.”
The hypocrisy is palpable.
The above does not begin to describe media bias, much less the revisionism taking place in academia or the ongoing culture conditioning practiced in the arts.
The “Democratic” Party
The Home of Harm
The Party of and by – but not for – Children. It is characterized by childishness, subscribing to the philosophy of childhood: “If I want it I should have it.” This is regardless of Constitutionality or any ethical principles.
The Rule of Whim Party as opposed to a Rule of Law Party.
The Peter Pan Party – Democrats depend on people who refuse to grow up.
The Santa Claus Party – dispensing gifts to all regardless of Constitutionality, but buying the allegiance of many voting constituencies and securing Democrat political power. Federal spending has become little more than the biggest source of campaign funds for Democrats. Cash cow? An unlawful government program is the Democrats’ Power Pig. Like all pigs, it will eat nearly anything, including those intended to benefit from it, while the Democrats feast on it.
The Robin Hood Party – stealing from “the rich” (that’s us) to give to the poor (their base).
The Party of the Pimps – turning America into a nation of whores willing to sell their liberties – and their neighbors’ liberties – in exchange for unlawful government benefits, obtained and secured by voting for Democrats. If preventing any reduction of a government benefit is the primary consideration in determining your vote, then you have been bought. The Democrats have you right where they want you.
They also provide political cover (pimping services) and taxpayer funding for the medical whores who have prostituted their skills to destroy human lives.
The Three Kinds of Democrats
The Whores Faction – Those willing and sometimes desperate, thanks to Democrat policies, to sell their liberties and their neighbors’ liberties, formerly considered inalienable rights, for unlawful government benefits, obtained and secured by voting for Democrats.
The Pimps Faction – The Party bosses, strategists and politicians who orchestrate the fears, dependencies, resentments and attitudes of entitlement of the Whores Faction. They also provide political cover and government funding for medi-whores.
The Thieves Faction – Those who believe themselves to be smarter and holier than everyone else, including God, having committed the Theological Abortion such that they can dispense with the Constitution, the Ten Commandments and any other laws that may conflict with their Rule of Whim agenda for power and control. These genuinely believe that thrusting the sticky-fingered, heavy hand of government deeper into their neighbors’ pockets, when there is no Constitutional authority for their spending priorities, is living out the gospel when it is simply theft.
All three factions are enablers of prenatal homicide
All three factions have committed the Mental Abortion of the prenatal child such that its life does not trump other aspects of the Democrat agenda
Democrat Character-Destroying Principles and Messages
Defeatism – you can’t succeed on your own, no matter what
Victimhood – everyone hates you and is out to oppress you – you are perfectly innocent
Envy thy neighbor – you deserve what they have but can only get it by government power
Blame thy neighbor – they have done you dirty in countless ways – the system is rigged
Corrupt thy neighbor – by promoting destructive ideas about freedom without morality so that wrecked lives become dependent on government assistance
Soak thy neighbor – seek payback - they got everything they have by cheating and privilege
Abort thy neighbor – destroy those who get in your way while it’s still possible before birth
Someone Else is responsible for all your problems – you have done nothing wrong
You can make Someone Else pay – the rest of the world owes you
Overall Message: YOU CAN’T (Without Us) – the gospel of failure
Whether you think you can or you think
you can’t, you’re right!
- Henry Ford
We live up or down to our expectations of ourselves
What do the Democrats’ expectations say about their view of the American people?
Two Questions for African-American Voters:
Do you think the Democrats’ soul-sapping messages of defeatism, discouragement, hopelessness and despair could have anything to do with your children’s comparatively poor performance in school or your young men’s anger, alienation and rebellion that leads to self-destructive behaviors and lands so many of them in prison or early graves?
Do you think the Democrats will cease their destructive messaging – their torrents of psychological and spiritual poison -- so long as you keep rewarding them for it with your votes?
A vote is a terrible thing to waste
and an even more terrible thing to use to advance evil.
Questions for the core Democrat voters:
Do you really believe that you can empower the Democrats’ abusive agenda of theft, governmental corruption, prenatal homicide and moral degradation with your vote, and that your fellow citizens will like and respect you for it?
Do you really think this is in your best interest?
Do you really think this is in your country’s best interest? Do you care?
Do you really believe that the Democrats’ polluting of our moral, ethical, legal, political, social and cultural environments is good for our country or for you?
Do you really think that empowering the Democrats’ evil agenda with your vote will have no bad consequences for your country or for yourself?
Do you really believe that if there’s ever anything even remotely resembling a Judgment Day that it would be in your best interest to enter it having repeatedly used your right to vote to empower an evil agenda?