Lozano, Sebastian, and Gabriel Villa. Data envelopment analysis of integer-valued inputs and outputs. Computers & Operations Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Lozano-Vivas, A., J. T. Pastor, and I. Hasan. 2001. European bank performance beyond country borders: What really matters? European Finance Review 5, : 141.
Lozano-Vivas, A., J. T. Pastor, and J. M. Pastor. 2002. An efficiency comparison of european banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, : 59.
Ludwin, W. G., and T. L. Guthrie. 1988. Evaluating schools: Data envelopment analysis vs. regression.
Ludwin, William G., and Thomas L. Guthrie. 1989. Assessing productivity with data envelopment analysis. Public Productivity Review 12, (4).
Luksetich, W., and P. N. Hughes. 1997. Efficiency of fund-raising activities: An application of data envelopment analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 26, (1): 73-84.
Lund, M., B. H. Jacobsen, and L. C. E. Hansen. 1993. Reducing non-allocative costs on danish dairy farms - application of nonparametric methods. European Review of Agricultural Economics 20, (3): 327-341.
Luo, Xueming. 2003. Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research 56, (8): 627.
Luo, Xueming, and Naveen Donthu. 2005. Assessing advertising media spending inefficiencies in generating sales. Journal of Business Research 58, (1): 28.
Luoma, K., M. L. Jarvio, I. Suoniemi, and R. T. Hjerppe. 1996. Financial incentives and productive efficiency in finnish health centers. Health Economics 5, (5): 435-445.
Lynch, Janet R., and Yasar A. Ozcan. 1994. U. S. hospital closures: An efficiency analysis. Hospital and Health Services Administration 39, (2): 205-220.
Lynde, Catherine, and J. Richmond. 1999. Productivity and efficiency in the UK: A time series application of DEA. Economic Modelling 16, (1): 105.
———. 1998. Productivity and efficiency in the UK: A time series application of DEA. Economic Modelling 16, (1) (1/1): 105-122, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VB1-3WS6T16-5/2/2631caaed12d2021ea1892dd9dcbbcbd.
Lyons, Deborah Milton. 1995. Performance measurement in urban transit: A comparative analysis of single and partial measures of transit performance (strategic managment).Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland College Park; 0117.
Ma, Jinlong, David G. Evans, Robert J. Fuller, and Donald F. Stewart. 2002. Technical efficiency and productivity change of china's iron and steel industry. International Journal of Production Economics 76, (3): 293.
Macarthur, John. 1997. Shadow pricing simplified: Estimating acceptable accurate economic rates of return using limited data. Journal of International Development 9, : 367-82.
MacCarthy, B. L., J. V. Jolleys, and S. Franklin. 1993. Comparing the efficiency of service units - A case study in primary health care using data envelopment analysis.
Macmillan, W. D. 1987. The measurement of efficiency in multiunit public services. Environment and Planning A 19, : 1511-1524.
———. 1986. The estimation and application of multi-regional economic planning models using data envelopment analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association 60, : 41-57.
Madden, Gary, Scott Savage, and Steven Kemp. 1997. Measuring public sector efficiency: A study of economics departments at australian universities. Education Economics 5, (2): 153-168.
Madu, C. N., and C. H. Kuei. 1998. Application of data envelop analysis in benchmarking. International Journal of Quality Science 3, : 320.
Maghyereh, Aktham. 2004. The effect of financial liberalization on the efficiency of financial institutions: The case of jordanian commercial banks. Savings and Development 28, (3): 235-70.
Magnussen, J. 1996. Efficiency measurement and the operationalization of hospital production. Health Services Research 31, (1): 21-37.
Magnussen, Jon. 1994. Hospital efficiency in norway: A nonparametric analysis. In Dissertations in economics no. 6. Bergen, Norway: Department of Economics, University of Bergen.
Mahadevan, R. 2002. A DEA approach to understanding the productivity growth of malaysias manufacturing industries. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19, : 587.
Mahadevan, Renuka. 2004. The economics of productivity in asia and australia. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Mahajan, Jayashree. 1991. A data envelopment analytic model for assessing the relative efficiency of the selling function. European Journal of Operational Research 53, (2): 189-205.
Mahmood, M. A., K. J. Pettingell, and A. I. Shaskevich. 1996. Measuring productivity of software projects - A data envelopment analysis approach. Decision Sciences 27, (1): 57-80.
Maindiratta, Ajay. 1990. Largest size-efficient scale and size efficiencies of decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Econometrics 46, : 57-72.
Maital, Shlomo, and Alexander Vaninsky. 2001. Data envelopment analysis with resource constraints: An alternative model with non-discretionary factors. European Journal of Operational Research 128, (1): 206.
———. 1999. Data envelopment analysis with a single DMU: A graphic projected-gradient approach. European Journal of Operational Research 115, (3): 518.
Majumdar, S. K. 1998. On the utilization of resources: Perspectives from the US telecommunications industry. Strategic Management Journal 19, (9): 809-831.
———. 1997. Incentive regulation and productive efficiency in the US telecommunications industry. Journal of Business 70, (4): 547-576.
———. 1996. Fall and rise of productivity in indian industry - has economic liberalization had an impact. Economic and Political Weekly 31, (48): M46-M53.
———. 1996. Government policies and industrial-performance - an institutional analysis of the indian experience. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 152, (2): 380-411.
———. 1995. Divestiture and productive efficiency in the US telecommunications industry. European Transactions on Telecommunications 6, (4): 385-395.
———. 1994. Assessing firms capabilities - theory and measurement - A study of indian pharmaceutical-industry. Economic and Political Weekly 29, (22): M83-M89.
Majumdar, S. K., and H. H. Chang. 1998. Optimal local exchange carrier size. Review of Industrial Organization 13, (6): 637-649.
Majumdar, S. K., and S. Venkataraman. 1998. Network effects and the adoption of new technology: Evidence from the US telecommunications industry. Strategic Management Journal 19, (11): 1045-1062.
Majumdar, Sumit K. 1998. Slack in the state-owned enterprise: An evaluation of the impact of soft-budget constraints. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16, (3): 377.
———. 1995. Does new technology adoption pay? electronic switching patterns and firm-level performance in US telecommunications. Research Policy 24, (5): 803.
———. 1995. X-efficiency in emerging competitive markets: The case of U.S. telecommunications. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 26, (1): 129.
Majumdar, Sumit Kumar. 1990. The impact of a competitive environment on corporate performance in U.S. telecommunications.Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Mallikarjun, M., and Kasyap Thakar. 2002. Economic reforms and technical efficiency: A study of selected indian industries. Indian Journal of Economics 82, (327): -68.
Manandhar, Raman, and John C. S. Tang. 2002. The evaluation of bank branch performance using data envelopment analysis: A framework. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 13, (1): 1.
Mancebon, M. J., and C. M. Molinero. 2000. Performance in primary schools. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51, : 843.
Maniadakis, N., B. Hollingsworth, and E. Thanassoulis. 1999. The impact of the internal market on hospital efficiency, productivity and service quality. Health Care Management Science 2, : 75.
Maniadakis, N., and E. Thanassoulis. 2000. Assessing productivity changes in UK hospitals reflecting technology and input prices. Applied Economics 32, : 1575.
Maniadakis, Nikolaos, and Emmanuel Thanassoulis. 2004. A cost malmquist productivity index. European Journal of Operational Research 154, (2): 396.
Mann, Gillian Margaret. 1997. Efficiency evaluations of north american university libraries by data envelopment analysis. Thesis M Sc., .
Manos, B., and A. Psychoudakis. 1997. Investigation of the relative efficiency of dairy farms using data envelopment analysis. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 36, : 188-97.
Mao, Weining, and Won W. Koo. 1997. Productivity growth, technological progress, and efficiency change in chinese agriculture after rural economic reforms: A DEA approach. China Economic Review 8, : 157-74.
Mar Molinero, Cecilio, and Maria Jesus Mancebon. 2001. Degeneracy in data envelopment analysis. Discussion papers in accounting and management science, no. 01-171. Southampton: Department of Accounting and Management Science University of Southampton.
Mar Molinero, Cecilio, and University of Southampton Department of Accounting and Management,Science. 1994. On the joint determination of efficiencies in a data envelopment analysis context. Discussion papers in accounting and management science ; no 94-77.
Mar Molinero, Cecilio, David Woracker, and University of Southampton Department of Accounting and Management,Science. 1995. Data envelopment analysis : A non mathematical introduction. Discussion papers in accounting and management science ; no 95-97.
Marcello, Braglia, Zanoni Simone, and Zavanella Lucio. 2003. Measuring and benchmarking productive systems performances using DEA: An industrial case. Production Planning and Control 14, : 542.
Marcoulides, George A. 1998. Modern methods for business research / edited by george A. marcoulides. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.: .
Marianna, Sigala, Jones Peter, Lockwood Andrew, and Airey David. 2005. Productivity in hotels: A stepwise data envelopment analysis of hotels rooms division processes. The Service Industries Journal 25, : 61.
Marinescu, Marian V. 2005. Multi-criteria timber allocation models for the analysis of sustainable forest management decisions.
Marinho, Alexandre, Marcelo Resende, and Luís Otávio Façanha. 1997. Brazilian federal universities: Relative efficiency evaluation and data envelopement analysis. Revista Brasileira De Economia 51, : 489-508.
Marinho, Alexandre, Marcelo Resende, and Luâis Otâavio Faðcanha. 1997. Brazilian federal universities : Relative efficiency evaluation and data envelopment analysis. [Rio de Janeiro]: Pâos-Graduaðcäao em Economia, Escola de Pos-Graduaðcäao, Centro de Estudos de Reforma do Estado.
Martic, M., S. Krcevinac, and J. Petric. 1996. An application of data envelopment analysis to assess relative efficiency of investments in agriculture.
Martic, M. M., and J. J. Petric. 1996. Basic data envelopment analysis models.
Martic, Milan, and Gordana Savic. 2001. An application of DEA for comparative analysis and ranking of regions in serbia with regards to social-economic development. European Journal of Operational Research 132, (2): 343.
Martin, Juan Carlos, and Concepcion Roman. 2001. An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of spanish airports prior to privatization. Journal of Air Transport Management 7, (3): 149.
Martinez-Budra, E., and Kevin Cullinane. 1999. A study of the efficiency of spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis.
Mathiyalakan, S., and C. Chung. 1996. A DEA approach for evaluating quality circles. Benchmarking: An International Journal 3, : 59.
Maudos, J., J. M. Pastor, and L. Serrano. 2000. Efficiency and productive specialization: An application to the spanish regions. Regional Studies: The Journal of the Regional Studies Association 34, : 829.
Mavrotas, George, and Panagiotis Trifillis. Multicriteria decision analysis with minimum information: Combining DEA with MAVT. Computers & Operations Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Mayston, David, and David Jesson. 1988. Developing models of educational accountability. Oxford Review of Education 14, (3): 321-339.
Mayston, David, David Jesson, and C. Fitz Gibbon. 1989. Data envelopment analysis and the generation of management performance information. In Performance indicators --- a dialogue.Multi Lingual Matters in Education.
Mazur, M. 1994. Evaluating the relative efficiency of baseball players? In Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications., eds. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, Arie Y. Lewin and Lawrence M. Seiford. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mazzocco, M. A., and L. M. Cloutier. 1995. Relative efficiency in food processing industries: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20, (2): 401.
Mbowa, Swaibu, and Lieb W. Nieuwoudt. 1998. Economies of size in sugar cane production in KwaZulu- natal. Development Southern Africa 15, (3): 399-412.
McCallion, G., D. G. McKillop, J. C. Glass, and C. Kerr. 1999. Rationalizing northern ireland hospital services towards larger providers: Best-practice efficiency studies and current policy. Public Money & Management 19, : 27.
McCarty, Therese A., Suthathip Yaisawarng, Harold O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, and S. Schmidt. 1993. Technical efficiency in new jersey school districts. In The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications. London: Oxford University Press.
McDonald, J. 1996. Note: A problem with the decomposition of technical inefficiency into scale and congestion components. Management Science 42, (3): 473-474.
McLaren, C. H. 1994. Selection of input and output measures in data envelopment analysis of large indiana school corporations.
McMillan, M. L., and D. Datta. 1998. The relative efficiencies of canadian universities: A DEA perspective. Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques 24, (4): 485-511.
McMullen, P. R., and G. V. Frazier. 1999. Using simulation and data envelopment analysis to compare assembly line balancing solutions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, : 149.
McMullen, Patrick R., and Gregory V. Frazier. 1996. Assembly line balancing using simulation and data envelopment analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting - Decision Sciences Institute 3, .
Mehrabian, S., M. R. Alirezaee, and G. R. Jahanshahloo. 1999. A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Computational Optimization and Applications 14, : 261.
Meimand, M., R. Y. Cavana, and R. Laking. 2002. Using DEA and survival analysis for measuring performance of branches in new zealands accident compensation corporation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53, : 303.
Mejza, Michael Conrad. 1998. Evaluating motor carrier safety processes using data envelopment analysis (safety management).Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland College Park; 0117.
Meng, Jun, and Nianmei Yang. 1995. Analysis on technology acquisition and the efficiency of economic scale.
Menon, Nirup. 1997. Productivity of information technology in the face of regulation and organizational choices: Evidence from the healthcare industry.Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Arizona; 0009.
Mensah, Y. M., and S. H. Li. 1993. Measuring production efficiency in a not-for-profit setting: An extension. The Accounting Review 68, (1): 66-88.
Mercan, Muhammet, Arnold Reisman, Reha Yolalan, and Ahmet Burak Emel. 2003. The effect of scale and mode of ownership on the financial performance of the turkish banking sector: Results of a DEA-based analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37, (3): 185.
Metters, Richard D., Vicente A. Vargas, and D. Clay Whybark. 2001. An investigation of the sensitivity of DEA to data errors. Computers & Industrial Engineering 41, (2): 163.
Metters, Richard, Kathryn King-Metters, and Madeleine Pullman. 2003. Successful service operations management. Mason, Ohio: South-Western.
Metzger, Lawrence M. 1992. Measuring production department efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Managerial Issues 4, (4): 494-510.
Meyer, M., and V. Wohlmannstetter. 1985. Effizienzmessung in krankenhaeusern. Zeitschrift Fuer Betriebswirtschaft 55, : 262-280.
Miliotis, Panayotis A. 1992. Data envelopment analysis applied to electricity distribution districts. Journal of the Operational Research Society 43, (5): 549-555.
Miller, Gerald, and Marcia Lynn Whicker. 1999. Handbook of research methods in public administration. Public administration and public policy ; 71. New York: M. Dekker.
Miller, J. L. 1996. Slack and performance in health care delivery. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 13, : 63.
Miller, S. R., and A. D. Ross. 2003. An exploratory analysis of resource utilization across organizational units: Understanding the resource-based view. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 23, : 1062.
Miller, Stephen M., and Athanasios G. Noulas. 1996. The technical efficiency of large bank production. Journal of Banking & Finance 20, : 495-509.
Mills, Andrew C. 1995. Determinants of technical efficiency in independent dialysis facilities (market competition).Ph.D. dissertation, Saint Louis University; 0193.
Mills, Joseph, and Durham University of. 2004. Efficiency evaluation and improvement guidelines for community colleges of connecticut : A data envelopment analysis approach. Durham: University of Durham.
MirHassani, S. A., and M. R. Alirezaee. 2005. An efficient approach for computing non-archimedean [epsilon] in DEA based on integrated models. Applied Mathematics and Computation 166, (2): 449.
Mirmirani, Sam, and Hsi-cheng Li. 1995. Health care efficiency measurement: An application of data envelopment analysis. Rivista Internazionale Di Scienze Economiche E Commerciali = International Review of Economics and Business 42, : 217-29.
Mizala, Alejandra, Pilar Romaguera, and Darío Farren. 2002. The technical efficiency of schools in chile. Applied Economics 34, (12): 1533-52.
Mobley, Lee Rivers, and Jon Magnussen. 1998. An international comparison of hospital efficiency: Does institutional environment matter? Applied Economics 30, : 1089-100.
Mohan, N., and J. Ruggiero. 2003. Compensation differences between male and female CEOs for publicly traded firms: A nonparametric analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54, : 1242.
Molinero, C. M. 1996. On the joint determination of efficiencies in a data envelopment analysis context.