*Tourism Management* 24, (4): 357.
Iida, Jeanne. 1991. U.S. bancorp seeks saving via branch-analysis system. *American Banker* 156, (195): 3.
Ito, R., T. Namatame, and T. Yamaguchi. 1999. Resource allocation problem based on the DEA model. *Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan* 42, : 149.
Itoh, H. 2002. Effeciency changes at major container ports in japan: A window application of data envelopment analysis. *Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies* 14, : 133.
Jacobs, R. 2001. Alternative methods to examine hospital efficiency: Data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. *Health Care Management Science* 4, : 103.
Jacobs, Rowena, and University of York. Centre for Health,Economics. 2000. *Alternative methods to examine hospital efficiency : Data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis*. Discussion paper (university of york. centre for health economics) ; 177. York: Centre for Health Economics University of York.
Jacobs, Rowena, and York University of. 2002. *An analysis of cost efficiency in english acute hospitals*. York: University of York.
Jaenicke, E. C. 2000. Testing for intermediate outputs in dynamic DEA models: Accounting for soil capital in rotational crop production and productivity measures. *Journal of Productivity Analysis* 14, : 247.
Jaforullah, M., and J. Whiteman. 1999. Scale efficiency in the new zealand dairy industry: A non-parametric approach. *The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics* 43, : 523.
Jaforullah, Mohammad. 1999. A comparison of production frontier methods using bangladesh handloom textile industry data. *University of Otago. Economics Discussion Papers* No. 9911, : [1-18].
Jaforullah, Mohammad, and Erandi Premachandra. 2003. Sensitivity of technical efficiency estimates to estimation approaches: An investigation using new zealand dairy industry data. *University of Otago. Economics Discussion Papers* No. 0306, : 1-22.
Jagannathan, R. 1985. An algorithm for a class of nonconvex programming problems with nonlinear fractional objectives. *Management Science* 31, (7): 847-851.
Jahanshahloo, G., F. Lotfi, and M. Zohrehbandian. 2005. Notes on sensitivity and stability of the classifications of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. *Journal of Productivity Analysis* 23, : 309.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., and M. Afzalinejad. A ranking method based on a full-inefficient frontier. *Applied Mathematical Modelling* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Jahanshahloo, G. R., A. R. Amirteimoori, and S. Kordrostami. 2004. Measuring the multi-component efficiency with shared inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 155, (1): 283.
———. 2004. Multi-component performance, progress and regress measurement and shared inputs and outputs in DEA for panel data: An application in commercial bank branches. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 151, (1): 1.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., and A. A. Foroughi. 2005. Efficiency analysis, generating an efficient extreme point for an MOLP, and some comparisons. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 162, (2): 991.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi F. Hosseinzadeh, and M. Moradi. 2005. A DEA approach for fair allocation of common revenue. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 160, (3): 719.
———. 2004. Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA with interval data. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 156, (2): 463.
———. Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA with interval data. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, , __http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TY8-4B1Y086-1/2/5acdf58444138192e58e59fc81485c84__.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi F. Hosseinzadeh, N. Shoja, and M. Sanei. 2004. An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using DEA. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 153, (1): 267.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi F. Hosseinzadeh, N. Shoja, and G. Tohidi. 2004. A method for finding efficient DMUs in DEA using 0-1 linear programming. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 159, (1): 37.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi F. Hosseinzadeh, N. Shoja, G. Tohidi, and S. Razavyan. 2004. Input estimation and identification of extra inputs in inverse DEA models. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 156, (2): 427.
———. 2004. The outputs estimation of a DMU according to improvement of its efficiency. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 147, (2): 409.
———. 2004. Ranking using l1-norm in data envelopment analysis. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 153, (1): 215.
———. The identification of nondominated and efficient paths on a network. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
———. A one-model approach to classification and sensitivity analysis in DEA. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi F. Hosseinzadeh, H. Zhiani Rezai, and F. Rezai Balf. 2005. Using monte carlo method for ranking efficient DMUs. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 162, (1): 371.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi F. Hosseinzadeh, and M. Zohrehbandian. 2005. Finding the piecewise linear frontier production function in data envelopment analysis. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 163, (1): 483.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., and M. Khodabakhshi. 2004. Determining assurance interval for non-archimedean element in the improving outputs model in DEA. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 151, (2): 501.
———. 2004. Suitable combination of inputs for improving outputs in DEA with determining input congestion: Considering textile industry of china. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 151, (1): 263.
———. 2003. Using input-output orientation model for determining most productive scale size in DEA. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 146, (2-3): 849.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, N. Shoja, G. Tohidi, and S. Razavyan. Sensitivity of efficiency classifications in the inverse DEA models. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
———. Undesirable inputs and outputs in DEA models. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Jahanshahloo, G. R., F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and M. Zohrehbandian. Finding the efficiency score and RTS characteristic of DMUs by means of identifying the efficient frontier in DEA. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Jahanshahloo, G. R., R. Kazemi Matin, and A. Hadi Vencheh. 2004. On return to scale of fully efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis under interval data. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 154, (1): 31.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., R. Kazemi Matin, and A. Hadi Vencheh. 2004. On FDH efficiency analysis with interval data. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 159, (1): 47.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., A. Memariani, F. Hosseinzadeh, and N. Shoja. 2005. A feasible interval for weights in data envelopment analysis. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 160, (1): 155.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., A. Memariani, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and H. Z. Rezai. 2005. A note on some of DEA models and finding efficiency and complete ranking using common set of weights. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 166, (2): 265.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., L. Pourkarimi, and M. Zarepisheh. Modified MAJ model for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Jahanshahloo, G. R., M. Sanei, Lotfi F. Hosseinzadeh, and N. Shoja. 2004. Using the gradient line for ranking DMUs in DEA. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 151, (1): 209.
———. Using the gradient line for ranking DMUs in DEA. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, , __http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TY8-492772K-1/2/a5f325dec4e93c02995cd5bdf11c84a7__.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., and M. Soleimani-Damaneh. 2005. A note on simulating weights restrictions in DEA: An improvement of thanassoulis and allen's method. *Computers & Operations Research* 32, (4): 1037.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., M. Soleimani-damaneh, and E. Nasrabadi. 2004. Measure of efficiency in DEA with fuzzy input-output levels: A methodology for assessing, ranking and imposing of weights restrictions. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 156, (1): 175.
Jahanshahloo, G. R., M. Soleimani-damaneh, and M. Rostamy-malkhalifeh. An enhanced procedure for estimating returns-to-scale in DEA. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Jahanshahloo, G. R., A. Hadi Vencheh, A. A. Foroughi, and R. Kazemi Matin. 2004. Inputs/outputs estimation in DEA when some factors are undesirable. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 156, (1): 19.
Jahanshahloo, Gholam Reza, and Majid Soleimani-Damaneh. 2004. Estimating returns to scale in data envelopment analysis: A new procedure. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* 150, (1): 89.
———. Estimating returns to scale in data envelopment analysis: A new procedure. *Applied Mathematics and Computation* In Press, Corrected Proof, , __http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TY8-488G951-3/2/a6fa2f8daabb62c38f5583fa0200f01c__.
Jamasb, Tooraj, Paul Nillesen, and Michael Pollitt. 2004. Strategic behaviour under regulatory benchmarking. *Energy Economics* 26, (5): 825.
Jamasb, Tooraj, and Michael G. Pollitt. 2003. International benchmarking and regulation: An application to european electricity distribution utilities. *Energy Policy* 31, (15): 1609-22.
———. 2001. International benchmarking and yardstick regulation: An application to european electricity utilities. *University of Cambridge. Dept. of Applied Economics. Dae Working Paper* No. 0115, : 1-54.
Jaska, Patrick V. 1991. Sensitivity for data envelopment analysis with an application to texas agricultural production.Ph. D. dissertation, University of Texas.
Jayasinghe, Milan John Chrysustom. 2002. Political economy, cost and efficiency aspects of market-based regulation the case of tradeable permits under the clean air act amendments of 1990.
Jemric, Igor, and Boris Vujcic. 2002. Efficiency of banks in croatia: A DEA approach. *Croatian National Bank. Working Papers* No. W-7, : 1-22.
———. 2002. Efficiency of banks in croatia: A DEA approach. *Comparative Economic Studies* 44, (2-3): 169-93.
Jenkins, Larry, and Murray Anderson. 2003. A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. *European Journal of Operational Research* 147, (1): 51.
Jennergren, L. Peter, and Børge Obel. 1985. *It there is something rotten in the state of denmark, we will find it with data envelopment analysis : Research efficiency of business administration and economics university departments*. Skrifter fra institut for virksomhedsledelse / odense universitet, 1985:7. Odense: Odense universitet.
Jesson, David. 1988. School effectiveness and efficiency. In *Quality in schools.*, 5-13National Foundation for Educational Research.
Jesson, David, and David Mayston. 1989. Measuring performance in authorities and schools. In *Education and training U.K.*, 12-21. Newbury, Berkshire, U.K.: Policy Journals.
Jesson, David, David Mayston, and Carol Taylor Fitz-Gibbon. 1989. Information, accountability and educational performance indicators. In *Performance indicators - a dialogue.*, 77-87. Clevedon, Avon, England: Bank House.
Jesson, David, David Mayston, and Peter Smith. 1987. Performance assessment in the education sector: Educational and economic perspectives. *Oxford Review of Education* 13, (3): 249-266.
Jha, R., P. Chitkara, and S. Gupta. 2000. Productivity, technical and allocative efficiency and farm size in wheat farming in india: A DEA approach. *Applied Economics Letters* 7, : 1.
Jian, Liu, and Yu De-jie. 2004. Evaluation of plant maintenance based on data envelopment analysis. *Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering* 10, : 203.
Jiancheng, G., and W. Junxia. 2004. Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency. *Scientometrics* 59, : 131.
Jitsuzumi, Toshiya, and Akihiro Nakamura. 2003. Measuring DEA efficiency in cable television network facilities: What are appropriate criteria for determining the amounts of governmental subsidies? *Socio-Economic Planning Sciences* 37, (1): 29.
Johnes, G., J. Johnes, and University of Lancaster Department of,Economics. 1990. *Measuring the performance of UK economics departments : An application of data envelopment analysis*.
Johnes, Geraint. 1998. The costs of multi-product organizations and the heuristic evaluation of industrial structure. *Socio-Economic Planning Sciences* 32, (3): 199.
———. 1995. Scale and technical efficiency in the production of economic research. *Applied Economic Letters* 2, : 7-11.
Johnes, Geraint, and Jill Johnes. 1993. Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: An application of data envelopment analysis. *Oxford Economic Papers* 45, : 332-47.
Johnes, J. 1996. Performance assessment in higher-education in britain. *European Journal of Operational Research* 89, (1): 18-33.
Johnes, Jill. Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK universities 1993. *European Journal of Operational Research* In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Johnes, Jill, and Geraint Johnes. 1995. Research funding and performance in U.K. university departments of economics: A frontier analysis. *Economics of Education Review* 14, (3): 301.
Johns, Nick. 1996. *Productivity management in hospitality and tourism*. New York: Cassell.
Johnson, Ronald W., Arie Y. Lewin, and Trudi Miller. 1984. Management and accountability models of public sector performance. In *Public sector performance, A conceptual turning point.*, 224-250John Hopkins Press.
Johnson, Sharon A., and Joe Zhu. 2003. Identifying "best" applicants in recruiting using data envelopment analysis. *Socio-Economic Planning Sciences* 37, (2): 125.
Johnson, Steven Lee. 1995. Organizational structure and the performance of contract training operations in american community colleges.Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin; 0227.
Johnston, Holly Hanson. 1990. Empirical studies in management accounting: Three essays on the U.S. airline industry, 1981-1985.Ph. D. dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Johnston, Katharine, and Karen Gerard. 2001. Assessing efficiency in the UK breast screening programme: Does size of screening unit make a difference? *Health Policy* 56, (1): 21.
Joro, T. 1997. A value efficiency approach to incorporation preference information in data envelopment analysis.
Joro, T., Pekka Korhonen, and J. Wallenius. 1998. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. *Management Science* 44, (7): 962-970.
Joro, Tarja. 2000. *Incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis*. Helsinki: School of Economics and Business Administration.
Joro, Tarja, Pekka Korhonen, and Jyrki Wallenius. 1995. *Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming*. Working papers / helsingin kauppakorkeakoulu. W, 144. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.
Joro, Tarja, Pekka Korhonen, and Stanley Zionts. 2003. An interactive approach to improve estimates of value efficiency in data envelopment analysis. *European Journal of Operational Research* 149, (3): 688.
Joro, Tarja, Pekka Korhonen, Stanley Zionts, and kauppakorkeakoulu Helsingin. 2002. *An interactive approach to improve estimates of value efficiency in data envelopment analysis*. Working papers / helsinki school of economics and business administration ; W-333. Helsinki: Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu.
———. 2000. *An interactive approach to improve estimates of value efficiency in data envelopment analysis*. Working papers / helsinki school of economics and business administration ; W-240. Helsinki: Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu.
Joseph, D. A., R. P. Cerveny, and Edwardo L. Rhodes. 1983. Application architecture and technologic efficiency : A comparative study of computerized bank transaction systems.
Joumady, Othman, and Catherine Ris. 2005. Performance in european higher education: A non-parametric production frontier approach. *Education Economics* 13, : 189.
Juan, Zhichai, Jianping Wu, and Mike McDonald. 2003. The socio-economic impacts assessment of advanced convoy driving on motorway. *Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice* 37, (9): 731.
Jun, Zhicai, Junwu Jin, and Jingxing Wang. 1994. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) method and transport enterprise technique and scale effectiveness.
Junoy, J. P. 1997. Measuring technical efficiency of output quality in intensive care units. *International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance* 10, : 117.
Justinger, Maryann E. Schwab. 1986. An efficiency analysis of services for adult students at community colleges.Ed. D. dissertation, State University of New York.
Kahraman, C., and E. Tolga. 1998. Data envelopment analysis using fuzzy concept.
Kalaba, R., and L. Tesfatsion. 1996. A multicriteria approach to model specification and estimation. *Computational Statistics & Data Analysis* 21, (2): 193-214.
Kalita, J. K., and G. R. Iyer. 1995. Effects of multicollinearity in data envelopment analysis (DEA) models of product market efficiency.
Kallio, M., and M. Kallio. 2002. Nonparametric methods for evaluating economic efficiency and imperfect competition. *Journal of Productivity Analysis* 18, : 171.
Kamakura, W. A., T. Lenartowicz, and B. T. Ratchford. 1996. Productivity assessment of multiple retail outlets. *Journal of Retailing* 72, (4): 333-356.
Kamakura, Wagner A. 1988. A note on the use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. *Management Science* 34, (10): 1273-1276.
Kamakura, Wagner A., Brian T. Ratchford, and Jagdish Agrawal. 1988. Measuring market efficiency and welfare loss. *Journal of Consumer Research* 15, (3).
Kanelopoulos, D. G. 1992. Evaluation of a clinic's productivity using the linear ProgrammingTechnique (application of the data envelopment analysis).
Kantor, Jeffrey, and Shlomo Maital. 1999. Measuring efficiency by product group: Integrating DEA with activity-based accounting in a large mideast bank. *Interfaces.* 29, (3): 27-36.
Kao, C. 2000. Data envelopment analysis in resource allocation: An application to forest management. *International Journal of Systems Science* 31, : 1059.
———. 2000. Measuring the performance improvement of taiwan forests after reorganization. *Forest Science* 46, : 577.
———. 2000. Short-run and long-run efficiency measures for multiplant firms. *Annals of Operations Research* 97, : 379.
———. 1998. Measuring the efficiency of forest districts with multiple working circles. *Journal of the Operational Research Society* 49, : 583.
———. 1995. Some properties of pareto efficiency under the framework of data envelopment analysis.
**Share with your friends:** |