Papers of the Annual Meeting



Download 6,23 Mb.
Page1/71
Date conversion28.06.2017
Size6,23 Mb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   71


The

Academy
of

Homiletics


40th Meeting
1965-2005
Papers of the Annual Meeting
“Preaching and Spirituality”
Hosted by

Baptist Theological Seminary at Richmond

Union Theological Seminary/Presbyterian School of Christian Education,

Virginia

School of Theology at Virginia Union University

Williamsburg, Virginia
December 1-3, 2005

Table of Contents
Introduction to the Papers of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Homiletics... ... 5

Hermeneutics and Bible Study

Wes Allen and James Nieman, Conveners
Note from the Conveners ... ... 6
Preaching Contrary Texts

Stephen Farris ... . 7
Homiletical Approaches to “Contrary” Biblical Texts: Ecclesiastes 3:1-8

Alyce M. McKenzie ... . 12
Keep the Faith, and Pass the Shrimp: Those Difficult Dietary Dicta

John C. Holbert... ... 18
American Football or European Soccer ball? On the shape of Scripture’s core commitment

Rein Bos ... . 22

Cruciform Spirituality and the Homiletics of Paul

Michael Knowles... ... 28

Preaching Spirituality from the Gospel of Luke

Eunjoo M. Kim ... ... 38

History of Preaching

Joey Jeter, Convener

Reason and the English Preaching Tradition

Katherine Calore, Sewanee... ... 48

Jonathan Edwards: Preaching the Feminine Face of Piety

Angela Dienhart Hancock ... . 58
Speaking of God: Preaching as a Spiritual Practice

Michael Pasquarello III ... .. 69
“The Authority of Celebrity and the Perils of Sincerity”

Ted A. Smith ... ... 79
Food for the Soul: Word and Sacrament in the Preaching of Hugh Latimer

Raewynne J. Whiteley ... . 89
Justice, Ethics, and the Preaching Task

Chris Smith, Convener
The Classification of Preaching: Preaching and Class Analysis

Brooks Berndt... .. 99


2

Narrative and Imagination

Thomas Troeger, Convener
“A House of Prayer in the Heart: how homiletics nurtures the church’s spirituality”

Thomas H. Troeger... . 109
The Interpreter of Dreams: Preaching to Effect Change

Judith M. McDaniel... ... 117
Images of a King's Relationship with His Soldiers: A Character Study in the David Narratives

J. Dwayne Howell ... . 125
Slow Preaching: Reflections on a Homiletical Spirituality

Gail A. Ricciuti... . 135
Performances Studies

Richard Ward, Convener
Getting in on the Act: An Evangelical Dialogue with the Performance School in Homiletics

Lisa Lamb ... ... 142

Anxiety and Preaching

Debra J. Mumford ... .. 152

Virgil's Destruktion of the Stoic Rational Agent: Rereading Aeneid IV after Nietzsche and Heidegger

P. Christopher Smith ... . 162

Contemporary Cultural Artifacts, the Bible, and Story

Dena L. Williams... . 172

Preaching and Worship

Craig Satterlee, Convener
Preaching the Spirit: The Liberation of Preaching

William C. Turner, Jr... . 179
Rhetoric

Robert Reid, Convener
Invitational Rhetoric as Nonviolent and Inherent Persuasion

Richard H. Park ... ... 188
Dwelling in the Word: Spirituality, Hymnody, and Preaching

Peter W. Rehwaldt... .. 199
From Listener to Learner: A Learner-Centered Model of Preaching

Robert Stephen Reid ... .. 209

3

Theology and Preaching

Joseph Webb, Convener
What Does It Mean to ‘Listen to Listeners?’

Joseph M. Webb ... .. 219
“Listening to Listeners"

Ronald J. Allen ... . 229
Rethinking Other-wise: Divine Reference in a Levinasian Homiletic

Wes Avram ... . 239
Spirituality, Wealth, and Proverbs

Dave Bland ... . 250
From Below: On the Significance of the Spiritual Component in Preaching

Runar Eldebo ... . 258
The Spirituality of Preaching as the Praxis of an Implicate Order of Grace

Gregory Heille ... .. 264

The Politics of Grace: Developing A Trinitarian Theology of Preaching

Lucy Lind Hogan... . 274

Theological Concepts in Empirical Homiletics

F. Gerrit Immink & Theo Pleizier ... .. 284

A Spirituality Made in China

Peter Lovrick ... . 294
Pedagogy
Contemplation: The Good Soil of the Preacher

Mark McCormick ... ... 302
From Fosdick Back to Formation: Re-orienting the Ethos of Preaching

Kay Bessler Northcutt ... .. 307
“I am Ready to Step Out of my Shame:” Women and Preaching in the Highlands of Chiapas

Deborah A. Organ ... .. 318
Radical Preacher Training

James E. Hayes ... . 328

Seeing the Truth: The Use of Visual Illustration in Preaching

Michael Duduit ... . 337


4


Introduction to the Papers of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Homiletics -


Williamsburg, Virginia - 2005.

There is so much going on in the world that causes us to ponder and wonder about what we can do to help shape a new understanding and appreciation of life. Hurricane Katrina wreaked havoc along the Gulf Coast and caused tremendous damage and death in New Orleans. And, the recent death of Rosa Parks who was the symbol of the Civil Rights movement - one whose sitting caused many African Americans and other Christians and Jews to stand up for justice - a stand propelled by the power of the Holy Spirit.
Williamsburg, Virginia is full of history and it has a prominent place in the life and legacy of
early America. Meeting here will allow us to ponder and meditate upon the value and
importance of preaching in today’s world where the issues of modernity and the artifacts of
history provide new opportunities for preaching and worship. From 1699 to 1780 Williamsburg
was the political and educational center of the American colonies and served as the capital of
Virginia. While there is a tendency on the part of some to romanticize and idealize this colonial
capital, I feel compelled to point out that in the 1770’s almost half of the population of

Williamsburg were slaves. Williamsburg, as a meeting place, symbolizes the dialectic between freedom and slavery, and the past and present. Gathering here is truly an opportune time to reflect on the connections between preaching and spirituality and its correlates: freedom, independence, and revolution.
In the following pages you will find the ideas and thoughts of a number of Academy members. There are some papers that address the theme explicitly and others intersect with homiletics in a more nuanced effort to expand our horizons. This year we are grateful to have excellent papers in eight groups.

Thank you so much to each person who has written a paper; however, I regret that my e-mail
address was listed incorrectly in the August newsletter because this ultimately meant that there
may have been a few papers that I never received even after making an effort to call each group
convener.

We look forward to seeing you in Williamsburg, Virginia on December 1-3, 2005.
James Henry Harris

First Vice President

2005 Academy of Homiletics
Note: The copyright of these papers belongs to the individual authors.

5

Note from the Conveners
A brief note of introduction will help explain the arrangement of the papers for the

Hermeneutics and Biblical Study section of this year’s gathering of the Academy of Homiletics.
The first set of papers—presented by Alyce M. McKenzie, Stephen Farris, John C.

Holbert, and Rein Bos—offer homiletical approaches to “contrary” biblical texts. Our focus is

upon texts that seem at odds with the core commitment to declare good news incumbent upon all preachers. What makes a text “contrary” in the context of proclamation? How are these texts to be viewed theologically as scripture for the church? What strategies could aid and direct
preaching on these texts? As has been our pattern for the past few years, our aim is to facilitate a true roundtable conversation at the Academy meeting. For that reason, the authors were not
asked to submit systematic, comprehensive position papers on the topic, but instead to develop brief provocative and evocative essays that would serve as a discussion starter for the study
group. As an added bonus, the panel discussion will include reflection on the same contrary text as a way of further demonstrating the authors’ positions and strategies. We especially hope to
generate a variety of hermeneutical approaches and practical ideas to offer students and
preachers. The papers included here promise to do just that.

The second set of papers—presented by Michael Knowles and Eunjoo M. Kim—are related quite directly to the theme of this year’s gathering of the Academy: Spirituality and Preaching. Knowles looks at this theme from a Pauline perspective, focusing on a cruciform spirituality evident in Paul’s letters, while Kim takes a Lukan angle of vision, combining that gospel’s spirituality with ideas suggested by narrative criticism, canonical criticism, and
Buddhist meditation. We look forward to the conversation on their insights.
O.W.A. and J.R.N.

6

Preaching Contrary Texts
Stephen Farris

Vancouver School of Theology

Several months ago we entertained a brilliant speaker on the Vanderbilt university
campus. The speaker spent some forty-five minutes explaining how to preach one of
those baby-bashing texts from the Hebrew Scriptures, to be specific, the baby-bashing
text, Psalm 137:9: “Happy shall they be who take your little ones and dash them against the rock!” The lecture was witty, quite brilliant, and full of homiletic insight. But when it was over, the first question from the audience was devastating. The question was, “Why bother? Why would preachers bother to preach a baby-bashing text when they could be declaring the good news of the gospel?”Why indeed? But perhaps that question can be left without response for a time inasmuch as the topic seems to propose that we may well actually want to preach, if not on Psalm 137:9 on texts that approach it in contrariness. The assignment accepted by this panel was to address the following three questions:

1. What makes a text “contrary” in the context of proclamation?

2. How are these texts to be viewed theologically as scripture for the church?

3. What strategies do you advocate in moving toward preaching on these texts?

In appropriately linear fashion, let me begin with the first question. A “contrary” text is
not a text that is difficult for the preacher to preach from. In my opinion the most difficult text in
the Bible to preach might well be 1 Corinthians 13. Perhaps the best sermon on that lovely text
might be to stand, point to the reader of the text and say, “What she said!” Then sit down. But
who could call that “contrary?” Nor is a contrary text a text that is difficult to hear. As Catherine
Gonsalus Gonzalez notes in Difficult Texts, “a particular demand may be contrary to

characteristic of a particular society… some of the gospel imperatives will find ready acceptance
in some places and yet be seen as almost impossible in others.”1

2 We are not in this panel
speaking, I think, of texts that are contrary to the mores and accepted wisdom of a given society.
Many such texts are very close to the heart of the gospel. We are, rather, speaking of texts that are
contrary to the gospel of Jesus Christ. That observation is well into “Duhh” territory and it is, of
course, much more complicated than it seems. But let it stand for the moment. Texts that fall into
this category might include not only Psalm 137:9 but the story of Jephthah’s daughter, Elisha and
the she-bears, some of the grizzlier passages from Revelation and the conquest texts from Joshua,
texts to which I am more sensitive now that I am in a school with a significant Native ministry
component.

Next, how are these texts to be viewed theologically as scripture for the church? The first
and most important observation must be this: these texts do not stand alone but rather are part of
a wider canon. That canon is both a body of literature and an invitation to a process. That is to
say that Psalm 137:9, for example, is not “scripture” by itself. It is a verse from the scriptures
which are as a whole the priceless heritage of the Christian Church. The earliest version of the
hermeneutical circle of which I have knowledge is Schleiermacher’s: it is impossible to
1 David Buttrick, A Captive Voice: The Liberation of Preaching (Louisville: WJKP, 1994), 11.

2 Catherine Gonsalus Gonzalez, Difficult Texts: A Preaching Commentary (Nashville: Abingdon, 2005), 4,5.
7

understand the whole without the parts and the parts without the whole.3 To restate the point
theologically: the whole of scripture is not scripture apart from its texts and the texts are not
scripture apart from the whole of scripture. At this point, we are interested primarily in the
second statement, that it is impossible to understand the parts without the whole and that the
texts are not scripture apart from the whole of scripture. We will return to the other half of the statement shortly.

As far as I can see, no text in scripture makes a claim that texts in atomic isolation are by
themselves scripture. The closest such statement is 2 Timothy 3:16-17: All scripture is inspired
by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, so
that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient, equipped for every good work.” This text,
beloved of fundamentalist Christians for some strange reason, does not affirm that every text of
scripture is inerrant, infallible, or even that it contains an edifying nugget of thought. It declares
that all scripture, pasa graphe, is useful for a whole range of valuable purposes in the church.

One might even translate the text as “Scripture as a whole is inspired by God, etc.” That translation does not do undue theological violence to the verse. Theological shorthand for “Scripture as a whole” is canon. The fact that we interpret texts within a canon means that, although both the whole and the parts are necessary for understanding, the whole is
hermeneutically privileged.

But the canon is not merely the body of literature; it is an invitation to a process. Because
the Church lives in, with, and under the scriptures, there is a constant process of interpretation,
restatement, shifting of viewpoints and of starting points. But this constant shifting is in relation
to the same body of texts. The canon is, as James A. Sanders has argued, marked both by
stability and by adaptability.4 The adaptability comes from the church’s resignification of these
texts in new situations. The stability comes from the fact that the resignification is of these texts,
including the contrary texts. This resignification occurs frequently, perhaps even primarily, but
not exclusively in preaching. I have argued elsewhere that inspiration resides in the “Word of
God” and occurs in the encounter with God through the texts rather than in the texts themselves.5
The key word in 2 Timothy 3:12-17 may be “useful.” The texts become scripture when
the church goes to them with the intention of finding teaching, reproof, and correction in its new
situation. They are Word of God when they are read with an eye to equipping for good works the
people of God. It may be that some of the “contrary” texts may be particularly useful for just
those purposes precisely because they are contrary and because they make us stop and take a
second look both at the scripture and ourselves. The double take can be a moment of grace.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   71


The database is protected by copyright ©sckool.org 2016
send message

    Main page