Journal for Critical Animal Studies Editorial Executive Board



Download 3,92 Mb.
Page5/14
Date conversion08.12.2018
Size3,92 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   14
.
Adelman, Rebecca A. “Atrocity and Aporiae: Teaching the Abu Ghraib Images, Teaching Against Transparency.” Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 14.1 (2014): 29-39. Print.

American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (2014). Ag-gag bills at the state level. Web. 21 November 2014. .

Animal Legal and Historical Center at Michigan State University’s College of Law (2014). “State Ecoterrorism / Animal Enterprise Protection Laws.” Web. .

Barclay, Eliza. “2013 was the Year Bills to Criminalize Animal Cruelty Videos Failed.” 27 December 2013. Web. .

Britzman, D.P. (2013). “Between Psychoanalysis and Pedagogy: Scenes of Rapprochement and Alienation.” Curriculum Inquiry 43.1 (2013): 95-117. Print.

---. “Teacher Education in the Confusion of Our Times.” Journal of Teacher Education, 51.3 (2000): 200-205. Print.

Campbell, Colin. “Humane Society Sues Raleigh for Rejecting Bus Ad About Caged Pigs.” The News & Observer 23 August 2013. Web. .

Clark, Kimberly Nicole. (2009). “No Democracy for Animal Lovers: The Exclusion and Marginalization of Animal Rights Activists in America.” Whittier Law Review 31: 319-343. Print.

Darder, Antonio, et. al. The Critical Pedagogy Reader. New York: Routledge, 2003. Print.

Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle. London: Rebel Press, 1967. Print.

Felman, Shoshana. “Education and Crisis, or the Vicissitudes of Teaching.” Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. Ed. Shoshana Felman and Dori Laub. New York: Routledge, 1992. 1-56. Print

Foer, Jonathan Safran. Eating Animals. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2009. Print.

Fried, Michael. Barthes’s punctum. Critical Inquiry 31.3 (2005): 539-574. Print.

Garoian, Charles R., and Yvonne M. Gaudelius. Spectacle Pedagogy: Art, Politics and Visual Culture. Albany: SUNY Press, 2008. Print.

Girgen, Jen. “State Animal Use Protection Statutes: An overview.” Animal Law 18.1 (2011): 57-74. Print.

Giroux, Henry A. “Education after Abu Ghraib: Revisiting Adorno’s Politics of Education.” Cultural Studies, 18.6 (2004): 779-815. Print.

Heybach, Jessica.A. “Learning to Feel What We See: Critical Aesthetics and ‘Difficult Knowledge’ in an Age of War.” Critical Questions in Education 3.1 (2012): 23-34. Print.

Hightower, Jim. “Ag-gag Bills: So Much for Sunshine.” Tulsa World, 2 May 2013, p. A17.

Print.

Kear, Adrian. “The Anxiety of the Image.” Parallax 11.3 (2005): 107-116. Print.



Lalvani, Suren. Photography, Vision, and the Production of Modern Bodies. Albany: SUNY Press, 1996. Print.

Laveck, J. (Producer), and Stein, J. (Director). Peaceable Kingdom: The Journey Home. 2012 [Documentary film]. USA: A Tribe of Heart.

Legal Monitor Worldwide. “The Terrible Price of Ag-gag Laws.” 17 May 2013, n.p.

Liptak, Adam. “In Abortion Protests, Which to Protect, Children or Speech?” The New York Times, 13 May 2013. Web. 11 November 2014. .

Mercy for Animals (Producer). Farm to Fridge. 2011. Web. .

National Chicken Council. Web. November 11, 2014 from .

Pachirat, Timothy. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight. New Haven: Yale UP, 2011. Print.

Painter, Corrine. “The Analogy between the Holocaust and the Factory Farm: A Defense.” Journal for Critical Animal Studies 12.1 (2014): 33-62. Print.

Parsons, Dennis. “Photography and Social Justice: Preservice Teachers and the Ocularized, Urban Other.” Activist Art in Social Justice Pedagogy. Eds. Barbara Beyerbach and R. Deborah Davis. New York: Peter Lang, 2011. 70-87. Print.

PETA. “NBC nixes family-friendly Thanksgiving Day Parade Ad.” 23 November 2009. Web. .

PETA (Producer). Glass Walls. 2010. Retrieved from .

Rancière, Jacques. Aesthetics and its Discontents. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2009. Print.

Rowe, Bradley D. “Understanding Animals Becoming Meat: Embracing a Disturbing Education.” Critical Education 2.7 (2011). Retrieved from .

Sontag, Susan. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003. Print.

---. “What Have We Done?” The Guardian. 24 May 2004. Web. .


Stray Philosophy: Human-Dog Observations on Language, Freedom and Politics

Eva Meijer0



Abstract: The paper draws on the author’s personal experiences with stray dog Olli to explore philosophical concepts around three themes: language, freedom, and politics. The paper focuses on the first three months with Olli, in which a common language and habits were created and a certain level of freedom for Olli was established. The first section shows how this language and these habits came into existence and argues this created a common world as well as a way to express that world, which changed both dog and human. The second section discusses learning to walk on the leash in relation to freedom and oppression in interspecies communities. The last section focuses on Olli’s political agency as a former stray dog, both on the micro- and macro level. By emphasizing Olli’s perspective and actions, the paper also aims to explore ways to move beyond anthropocentrism in philosophy.
Keywords: animal languages, human-animal intersubjectivity, political animal agency, political animal voice, animal freedom
Introduction

In the early evening of November 17, 2013, Olli arrived at Schiphol Airport. By that time he had been travelling for over twenty-four hours. He had left Pascani in the North of Romania on Saturday afternoon, arrived in Bucharest early Sunday morning, waited at the airport for several hours and then flew to the Netherlands, where I was waiting for him. I was not the only nervous person at Arrivals. Olli was one of ten dogs who travelled to The Netherlands that evening, accompanied by two volunteers of a small Dutch animal welfare organization, “Dierenhulp Orfa”.26 My aunt had offered to drive us home and she chatted cheerfully to the other waiting humans while I was watching the door.

The first dogs who arrived were young and very good-looking, with long hair and fluffy ears. Olli was the last dog to come out of the door and I recognized his black and white fur immediately. Before I saw him, I had already heard him wagging his tail to the sides of his crate loudly. The volunteers put the crate down in front of me and I sat down on the floor to speak to Olli. He was panting because he was nervous, his eyes were red and he smelled really bad, but above all he was extremely enthusiastic about all this human attention. He was also quite a bit larger than I expected. One of the volunteers opened the door of his crate and put a collar and a harness on him. She gave me two leashes and Olli stepped out of the crate. Overwhelmed by lights and people, he lay down on the floor instantly. I sat down next to him and told him how happy I was that he was here. He stood up, greeted some of the other dogs, then lay down again, still wagging his tail.

When most of the other dogs had left, I told Olli we were going home. He refused to get up. My aunt’s car was parked in front of the airport and we needed to cross the main hall to get there. I tried to seduce Olli with food, but he was far too nervous to eat. So I picked him up, waved to the humans and off we went. Olli was not only quite a bit larger than expected, he was also rather heavy; I had to put him down a few times, where he again made himself as flat and small as possible (all the time still wagging his tail as if his life depended on it). It took us about fifteen minutes to get to the car. By the time we got there, we had already both decided to trust the other, because we needed to.



This paper is a philosophical exploration of the experiences Olli and I had in the first three months we spent together. In this time period, we created the beginnings of a common language, we developed habits and we established a certain degree of freedom for Olli, who learned to deal with living in a city. Both of us put a lot of effort into this; although I am the one who writes down what happened, Olli’s voice is as important as mine. The paper is divided in three sections: language and habits, freedom and walking on the leash, and politics. I could have also written about other things (love, belonging, play, fear) but these were the topics we discussed most explicitly. I end with some remarks about Olli’s influence on me, and about how these experiences can shed light on new forms of living together.

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   14


The database is protected by copyright ©sckool.org 2016
send message

    Main page