Department of education



Download 261,41 Kb.
Page3/3
Date08.12.2018
Size261,41 Kb.
1   2   3

Legend QD – Qualitative Description
25.00 - 44.49 Unsatisfactory US

44.50 – 59.49 Moderately Satisfactory MS

59.50 - 74.49 Satisfactory S

74.50 - 89.49 Very Satisfactory VS

89.50 – 100 Excellent E

Overall, the IPEd Advocacy meeting was conducted excellently (mean=93.75). All indicators except venue and accommodation which is still very satisfactory (mean = 88.12) were rated as excellent. The top 4 indicators are activity management team (mean = 96.09), participants’ learning (mean = 95.71), delivery of activity content (mean = 94.88) and trainers’ conduct of the session (mean = 94.84).


Thus, the IPEd Advocacy meeting was a great success.

More details of IPEd Advocacy meeting are in the next page.



Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Regional Office No. 02

(Cagayan Valley)

Carig Sur, Tuguegarao City, Cagayan
IPEd Advocacy Meeting

July 3-4, 2013

Cauayan North Central School

EVALUATION RESULTS
Number of Participants

Cauayan City 27

Santiago City 27
The indicators were rated using the following scale:

1 (Strongly Disagree) 2 (Disagree) 3 (Agree) 4 (Strongly Agree)


Qualitative Descriptions (QD) of Means

Each rating was converted to 100-point scale. This scale was reduced to a 5-point scale as follows:
25.00 - 44.49 Unsatisfactory US

44.50 – 59.49 Moderately Satisfactory MS

59.50 - 74.49 Satisfactory S

74.50 - 89.49 Very Satisfactory VS

89.50 – 100 Excellent E


Indicators

Mean

QD

  1. Program, Planning, Management & Preparation

94.44

E

  1. The activity was delivered as planned

93.33

E

  1. The activity was managed efficiently

95.56

E

  1. The activity was well-structured

94.45

E

B. Attainment of Objectives

94.26

E

  1. The activity objectives were clearly presented

95.56

E

  1. The session objectives were logically arranged

92.22

E

  1. The activity session objectives were attained

95.00

E

C. Delivery of activity content

94.88

E

  1. Activity content was appropriate to trainees roles and responsibilities

98.26

E

  1. Content delivered was based on authoritative and reliable sources

95.46

E

  1. New learning was clearly presented

95.56

E

  1. The session activities were effective in generating learning

96.11

E

  1. Adult learning methodologies were used of effectively

93.89

E

  1. Management of learning was effectively structured, eg. Portfolio, synthesis of previous learning, etc.

90.00

E

D. Participants’ Learning

95.71

E

  1. Participants were encouraged to consider how ideas and skills gained during the training could be incorporated into their own practices.

95.46

E

  1. Contribution of all participants, both male and female, were encouraged.

96.67

E

  1. Participants demonstrated a clear understanding of the content delivered

95.00

E

E. Trainer’s Conduct of the Session

94.84

E

  1. The trainer’s competencies were evident in the conduct of the sessions.

94.32

E

  1. Teamwork among the trainers and staff was manifested

96.59

E

  1. Trainers established a positive learning environment

95.83

E

  1. Training activities move quickly enough to maintain trainees’ interest

92.61

E

F. Provisions of Support Materials

94.26

E

  1. Training materials were clearly useful

92.78

E

  1. Powerpoint presentations supported the flow of the sessions

95.56

E

  1. The resources provided were appropriate to participants need

94.45

E

G. Activity Management Team

96.09

E

  1. Activity management team was efficient

95.56

E

  1. Activity management team was responsible to the needs of the participants

96.11

E

  1. Activity management team members were courteous.

96.59

E

H. Venue and accommodation

88.12

VS

  1. The venue was well lighted and ventilated

88.95

VS

  1. The venue was comfortable with sufficient space for program activities

90.00

E

  1. the venue had sanitary and hygiene conditions

83.33

VS

  1. Meals were nutritious and sufficient quantity and quality

92.22

E

  1. The accommodation was comfortable with sanitary and hygienic conditions

86.11

VS

Overall rating

93.75

E

Prepared by:
IPEd Advocacy Team

Divisions of Cauayan City and Santiago City


Share with your friends:
1   2   3


The database is protected by copyright ©sckool.org 2019
send message

    Main page