# Conformity Lesson 2 Asch’s Conformity Experiment

 Date conversion 17.10.2017 Size 8,08 Kb.

• Lesson 2

## Asch’s Conformity Experiment

• In Sherif’s experiment there was no definite right or wrong answer, this meant there was good reason for the participants to be influenced by others. If they were not sure of the correct answer then there is reason for uncertainty. Sherif’s experiment does not reveal anything surprising about human behaviour. It was this problem that prompted Asch to conduct an experiment with a correct answer. Would people conform to judgements that were definitely wrong?
• Asch conducted a pilot study by asking 36 people to match the target line with one of the comparison lines. In all trials they got the answer correct – this was definitely an unambiguous task.

## To investigate whether participants would yield (conform) to the incorrect majority even when the correct answers were always obvious.

• Aim
• To investigate whether participants would yield (conform) to the incorrect majority even when the correct answers were always obvious.

## The line judgement task seven male stooges and one naive participant were asked to say aloud which one of three comparison lines were the same length as the target line.  The correct answer was always obvious. The genuine participant called out his answer second last.

• Method
• The line judgement task seven male stooges and one naive participant were asked to say aloud which one of three comparison lines were the same length as the target line.  The correct answer was always obvious. The genuine participant called out his answer second last.

## In some trials the accomplices gave all the same wrong answers.

• Results
• In some trials the accomplices gave all the same wrong answers.
• Asch measured how many times the naïve participant gave a correct answer or conformed to the incorrect majority. Just over 22% of participants gave the correct answer on all 12 occasions. This means that 78% of participants gave at least one incorrect response in line with the majority. About 5% gave the same answer as all the incorrect majority on all occasions.

## Even in unambiguous situations, there may be strong group pressure to conform, especially if the group is a unanimous majority.

• Conclusion
• Even in unambiguous situations, there may be strong group pressure to conform, especially if the group is a unanimous majority.

## Their perception must have been inaccurate and the majority’s accurate. Perhaps they were suffering from eye strain or sitting in a bad position.

• Why did people conform?
• Their perception must have been inaccurate and the majority’s accurate. Perhaps they were suffering from eye strain or sitting in a bad position.
• Not to stand out and look inferior or stupid.
• Not to be an outcast.
• To convey a good impression of themselves.
• Not to spoil the experiment or upset the experimenter.

## A major factor in conformity was to avoid conflict and social disapproval. Asch (1956) investigated these fears of social disapproval directly by doing a further experiment.

• A major factor in conformity was to avoid conflict and social disapproval. Asch (1956) investigated these fears of social disapproval directly by doing a further experiment.
• The procedure was the same except a stooge gave the wrong answer in a room of 16 naïve participants. Asch found that the naïve participants acted in disbelief and laughed and ridiculed the stooge. Even the experimenter found it difficult to control his laughter. It does therefore seem that the participants were justified in fearing conflict and social disapproval.

## The findings of Asch’s work have implications for many aspects of group behaviour such as decision making and social interaction.

• Evaluation of Asch (+)
• The findings of Asch’s work have implications for many aspects of group behaviour such as decision making and social interaction.
• His experiment can be seen as an example of the rigorous standards required in psychological research: participants were studied under highly controlled conditions, Asch was able to carry out statistical analyses on the data collected and his study has been replicated with similar results produced (Neto,1995).

## Lack of validity

• Evaluation (-)
• Lack of validity
• Ethical issues
• 2/3 of judgements were correct?
• Conformity is conveyed as a negative response but it does have beneficial effects. It is important for social stability; group norms provide a standard and expectations of behaviour ensuring a structure and order for social groups.

## Make notes from the text book on the 5 variations to Asch’s study.

• Variations of Asch’s study
• Make notes from the text book on the 5 variations to Asch’s study.
• Size of majority
• Unanimity
• Self Esteem
• Anonymity
• Be aware that this has come up as an essay question on a past paper.

## Normative Social Influence

• Why do people conform?
• Normative Social Influence
• Informational Social Influence

## This occurs when people have a need to be liked. The power of the need for social approval results in a public agreement, but this is not likely to change in private.

• Normative Social Influence
• This occurs when people have a need to be liked. The power of the need for social approval results in a public agreement, but this is not likely to change in private.
• This was the main reason for conformity in Asch’s experiment.
• This type of conformity is known as compliance. Because the conformity is only superficial, the change in opinion or behaviour lasts only as long as the group pressure itself.

## People conform because they believe that the group has more expertise than they do. This means that their opinion actually changes.

• Informational social influence
• People conform because they believe that the group has more expertise than they do. This means that their opinion actually changes.
• This comes into play when people aren’t sure if they are correct, (i.e) Sherif’s auto kinetic effect experiment.