A cyber-Bibliography for Data Envelopment Analysis (1978--2005)



Download 1,78 Mb.
Page14/26
Date conversion23.10.2016
Size1,78 Mb.
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   ...   26
International Journal of Systems Science 26, (9): 1549-1558.

———. 1993. Efficiency improvement in data envelopment analysis. Heidelberg; New York.

Kao, C., and S. T. Liu. 2000. Data envelopment analysis with missing data: An application to university libraries in taiwan. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51, : 897.

Kao, C., and Y. C. Lin. 2004. Evaluation of the university libraries in taiwan: Total measure versus ratio measure. Journal of the Operational Research Society 55, : 1256.

Kao, C., and Y. C. Yang. 1991. Measuring the efficiency of forest management. Forest Science 37, (5): 1239-1252.

Kao, Chiang. 1994. Efficiency improvement in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 73, (3): 487.

———. 1994. Evaluation of junior colleges of technology: The taiwan case. European Journal of Operational Research 72, (1): 43.

———. Interval efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .

Kao, Chiang, Pao-long Chang, and S. N. Hwang. 1993. Data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of forest management. Journal of Environmental Management 38, (1): 73.

Kao, Chiang, Liang-Hsuan Chen, Tai-Yue Wang, Shyanjaw Kuo, and Shi-Dai Horng. 1995. Productivity improvement: Efficiency approach vs effectiveness approach. Omega 23, (2): 197.

Kao, Chiang, and Shiang-Tai Liu. 2004. Predicting bank performance with financial forecasts: A case of taiwan commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance 28, (10): 2353.

———. 2003. A mathematical programming approach to fuzzy efficiency ranking. International Journal of Production Economics 86, (2): 145.

———. 2000. Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 113, (3): 427.

Kao, Chiang, and Yong Chi Yang. 1992. Reorganization of forest districts via efficiency measurement. European Journal of Operational Research 58, (3): 356-362.

Karkazis, John, and Emmanuel Thanassoulis. 1998. Assessing the effectiveness of regional development policies in northern greece using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 32, : 123-37.

Karlaftis, Matthew G. 2004. A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. European Journal of Operational Research 152, (2): 354.

———. 2003. Investigating transit production and performance: A programming approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 37, (3): 225.

Karsak, E. E. 1998. A two-phase robot selection procedure. Production Planning and Control 9, : 675.

Kashani, Hossein A. 2005. Regulation and efficiency: An empirical analysis of the united kingdom continental shelf petroleum industry. Energy Policy 33, (7): 915.

———. 2005. State intervention causing inefficiency: An empirical analysis of the norwegian continental shelf. Energy Policy 33, (15): 1998.

Katib, M. Nasser, and Kent Matthews. 1999. A non-parametric approach to efficiency measurement in the malaysian banking sector. Singapore Economic Review 44, (2): 89-114.

Katims, Michael Allen. 1985. Using efficiency analysis to evaluate program effects of educational intervention.Ph. D. dissertation, College of Education, University of Texas.

Kazakov, Alex, Wade D. Cook, and Yaakov Roll. 1989. Measurement of highway maintenance patrol efficiency: Model and factors. Transportation Research Record 1216, : 39-45.

Keeves, John P. 1997. Educational research, methodology and measurement : An international handbook. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: Pergamon.

Keh, Hean Tat, and Singfat Chu. 2003. Retail productivity and scale economies at the firm level: A DEA approach. Omega 31, (2): 75.

Keh, Hean Tat, Singfat Chu, and Jiye Xu. Efficiency, effectiveness and productivity of marketing in services. European Journal of Operational Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .

Keiding, Hans. 2002. Environmental effects of consumption: An approach using DEA and cost sharing. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Nota Di Lavoro No. 90.2002, : 1-16.

Kemerer, Chris F. 1988. Production process modeling of software maintenance productivity.

———. 1987. Measurement of software development productivity.Ph. D. dissertation, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie-Mellon University.

Kennedy, Cathal. 2003. The relative efficiency of irish universities : An application of data envelopment analysis. Dublin: Trinity College.

Kerstens, K. 1996. Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of french urban transit companies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 30, (6): 431.

Kerstens, Kris, Philippe Vanden Eeckaut, and Université catholique de Louvain (1970- ). Center for Operations Research and Econometrics.,. 1995. Technical efficiency measures on DEA and FDH : A reconsideration of the axiomatic literature. CORE discussion paper ; 9513. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Center for Operations Research & Economics, Universite catholique de Louvain.

Kerstens, Kristiaan, and Philippe Vanden Eeckaut. 1999. Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: A new method based on goodness-of-fit. European Journal of Operational Research 113, (1): 206.

Khouja, Moutaz. 1995. The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering 28, (1): 123.

Kim, I., and L. C. Hendry. 1998. Using DEA to assess NATO burden-sharing. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49, : 228.

Kim, Sarah. 2004. Merger-related productivity gains in the canadian banking industry. Thesis (M.A.Sc.)., University of Toronto, 2004.

Kim, Soung-Hie, Choong-Gyoo Park, and Kyung-Sam Park. 1999. An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data. Computers & Operations Research 26, (1): 59.

Kim, Sung-Jong. 1992. Productivity of cities. theory, measurement, and policy implications: The korean case.Ph. D. dissertation, University of Texas.

Kim, Woodbury, and Dollery Brian. 2004. Efficiency measurement in australian local government: The case of new south wales municipal water services. Review of Policy Research 21, : 615.

Kinoshita, Randal Mitsugi. 1998. The application of production frontier techniques to the metaproduction function: Estimating international agricultural productivity and efficiency (international agriculture).Ph.D. dissertation, University of Georgia; 0077.

Kirigia, J. M., Ali Emrouznejad, L. G. Sambo, N. Munguti, and W. Liambila. 2004. Using data envelopment analysis to measure the technical efficiency of public health centers in kenya. Journal of Medical Systems 28, : 155.

Kirigia, Joses M., Ali Emrouznejad, Luis G. Sambo, and School Warwick Business. 2000. Measurement of technicaI efficiency of public hospitals in kenya : Using data envelopment analysis approach. Warwick business school research papers ; no. 340. Coventry: Warwick Business School Research Bureau.

Kirjavainen, Tanja, and Heikki A. Loikkanent. 1998. Efficiency differences of finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and tobit analysis1. Economics of Education Review 17, (4) (10): 377-394, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VB9-3V603MH-K/2/2969f10838b03f64350c8340f317c6e1.

Kirkley, J. E., D. Squires, M. F. Alam, and H. O. Ishak. 2003. Excess capacity and asymmetric information in developing country fisheries: The malaysian purse seine fishery. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85, : 647.

Kitchenham, Barbara A. 2002. The question of scale economies in software--why cannot researchers agree? Information and Software Technology 44, (1): 13.

Kittelsen, Sverre A. C. 1998. Using data envelopment analysis to measure production efficiency in the public sector. Økonomiske doktoravhandlinger / universitetet i oslo, 45. Oslo: Sosialøkonomisk institutt, Oslo univ.

Kittelsen, Sverre A. C., and Finn R. Forsund. 1992. Efficiency analysis of norwegian district courts. Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, (3): 277-306.

Kleine, A. 2004. A general model framework for DEA. Omega 32, (1): 17.

Kleine, Andreas. 1999. Data envelopment analysis aus entscheidungstheoretischer sicht. Universitat Des Saarlandes. Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft. Diskussions Beitrage. Series A No. A 9903, : 1-24.

Kleinsorge, I. K. 1994. Financial and efficiency differences in family-owned and non-family-owned nursing homes: An oregon study. Family Business Review 7, : 73.

Kleinsorge, Ilene K. 1988. Incorporation of quality considerations in measuring relative technical efficiency of nursing homes.Ph. D. dissertation, School of Business, University of Kansas.

Kleinsorge, Ilene K., and Dennis F. Karney. 1992. Management of nursing homes using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 26, (1) (1): 57-71, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V6Y-45N4KXY-26/2/23356c80f2298bea089ff209fd78680d.

Kleinsorge, Ilene K., Philip B. Schary, and Ray D. Tanner. 1992. Data envelopment analysis for monitoring customer-supplier relationships. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 11, (4): 357.

Kleinsorge, Ilene K., Phillip B. Schary, and Ray D. Tanner. 1991. The shipper-carrier partnership: A new tool for performance evaluation. Journal of Business Logistics 12, (2).

———. 1989. Evaluating logistics decisions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management 19, (12).

Klimberg, R. K., and M. S. Puddicombe. 1995. A multiple objective approach to data envelopment analysis.

Klimberg, Ronald, and Don Kern. 1992. Understanding data envelopment analysis (DEA). Boston, MA: Boston University School of Management.

Klopp, Gerald A. 1985. The analysis of the efficiency of productive systems with multiple inputs and outputs.Ph. D. dissertation, Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Illinois.

Klutke, G. A., D. Mitta, B. Nnaji, and Lawrence M. Seiford. 1992. Proceedings of the first industrial engineering research conference. Chicago, IL.

Kneip, A., and L. Simar. 1996. A general framework for frontier estimation with panel-data. Journal of Productivity Analysis 7, (2-3): 187-212.

Kneip, Alois, Byeong U. Park, and Léopold Simar. 1998. A note on the convergence of nonparametric DEA estimators for production efficiency scores. Econometric Theory 14, : 783-93.

Kocher, Martin G., Mikulas Luptacik, and Matthias Sutter. Measuring productivity of research in economics: A cross-country study using DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences In Press, Corrected Proof, .

Kontodimopoulos, Nick, Panagiotis Nanos, and Dimitris Niakas. Balancing efficiency of health services and equity of access in remote areas in greece. Health Policy In Press, Corrected Proof, .

Kontodimopoulos, Nick, and Dimitris Niakas. 2005. Efficiency measurement of hemodialysis units in greece with data envelopment analysis. Health Policy 71, (2): 195.

Koopmans, T. C., and T. C. Koopmans. 1951. Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In Activity analysis of production and allocation. New York: Wiley.

Kooreman, Peter. 1994. Data envelopment analysis and parametric frontier estimation: Complementary tools. Journal of Health Economics 13, (3): 345.

———. 1994. Nursing home care in the netherlands: A nonparametric efficiency analysis. Journal of Health Economics 13, (3): 301.

Kordrostami, Sohrab, and Alireza Amirteimoori. Un-desirable factors in multi-component performance measurement. Applied Mathematics and Computation In Press, Corrected Proof, .

Korhonen, Pekka, T. Joro, and J. Wallenius. 1997. Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis & multiple objective linear programming.

Korhonen, Pekka, and Mikulas Luptacik. 2004. Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 154, (2): 437.

Korhonen, Pekka, Mikulas Luptacik, and kauppakorkeakoulu Helsingin. 2000. Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants : An extension of data envelopment analysis. Working papers / helsinki school of economics and business administration ; W-241. Helsinki: Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu.

Korhonen, Pekka, Sari Rytkoski, Mikko Syrjñen, and kauppakorkeakoulu Helsingin. 2001. Multiple objective approach as an alternative to radial projection data. Working papers / helsinki school of economics and business administration ; W-301. Helsinki: Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu.

Korhonen, Pekka, M. Soismaa, and A. Siljamaki. 2002. On the use of value efficiency analysis and some further developments. Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, : 49.

Korhonen, Pekka, S. Stenfors, and M. Syrjanen. Multiple objective approach as an alternative to radial projection in DEA: Special issue on efficiency analysis: Proceedings of a research workshop on the state-of-the-art and future research in efficiency analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 20, : 305.

Korhonen, Pekka, and M. J. Syrjanen. 2003. Evaluation of cost efficiency in finnish electricity distribution. Annals of Operations Research 121, : 105.

Korhonen, Pekka, Risto Tainio, and Jyrki Wallenius. 2001. Value efficiency analysis of academic research. European Journal of Operational Research 130, (1): 121.

Kornbluth, J. S. H. 1991. Analyzing policy effectiveness using cone restricted data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 42, (12): 1097-1104.

Korostelev, A. P., L. Simar, and A. B. Tsybakov. 1995. On estimation of monotone and convex boundaries. Pub. Inst. Stat. Univ. Paris 34, (1): 3-18.

———. Efficient estimation of monotone boundaries. Annals of Statistics.

Koski, Heli A., and Sumit K. Majumdar. 2000. Convergence in telecommunications infrasturcture development in OECD countries. Information Economics and Policy 12, (2): 111-31.

Kozmetsky, G., and P. Yue. 1998. Comparative performance of global semiconductor companies. Omega 26, (2): 153.

Kozmetsky, George, and Piyu Yue. 1997. Global economic competition: Today's warfare in global electronics industries and companies. Boston: luwer Academic Publishers.

Kraft, Evan, Richard Hofler, and James Payne. 2002. Privatization, foreign bank entry and bank efficiency in croatia: A fourier-flexible function stochastic cost frontier analysis. Croatian National Bank. Working Papers No. W-9, : 1-17.

Krishna Kumar, C., and Bani K. Sinha. 1999. Efficiency based production planning and control models. European Journal of Operational Research 117, (3): 450.

Krivonozhko, V. E., O. B. Utkin, A. V. Volodin, and I. A. Sablin. 2002. Interpretation of modelling results in data envelopment analysis. Managerial Finance 28, : 37.

Krüger, Jens J. 2003. The global trends of total factor productivity: Evidence from the nonparametric malmquist index approach. Oxford Economic Papers 55, (2): [265]-86.

Kulshreshtha, Mudit, and Jyoti K. Parikh. 2002. Study of efficiency and productivity growth in opencast and underground coal mining in india: A DEA analysis. Energy Economics 24, (5): 439-53.

Kumar, C., and B. K. Sinha. 1998. Efficiency based decision rules for production planning and control. International Journal of Systems Science 29, (11): 1265-1280.

Kuntz, Ludwig, Stefan Scholtes, Judge Institute of Management Studies., and University of Cambridge. Engineering Department.,. 1996. Sensitivity of efficient technologies in data envelopment analysis. Research papers in management studies. 1996 ; no. 13. Cambridge: Judge Institute of Management Studies in conjunction with University of Cambridge, Engineering Dept.

Kuo, Nai-Wen. 1998. Measurement of hospital performance: A longitudinal study of california hospitals (managed care, medicare).Ph.D. dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University; 0098.

Kuo-Ping, C., and G. Yeah-Yuh. 1995. Piecewise loglinear frontier and log efficiency measures. Computers and Operations Research 22, : 1031.

Kuosmanen, Timo, Thierry Post, and Timo Sipilainen. 2004. Shadow price approach to total factor productivity measurement: With an application to finnish grass-silage production. Journal of Productivity Analysis 22, : 95.

Kuosmanen, T., and T. Post. 2002. Nonparametric efficiency analysis under price uncertainty: A first-order stochastic dominance approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, : 183.

———. 2002. Quadratic data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53, : 1204.

Kuosmanen, Timo. 2001. DEA with efficiency classification preserving conditional convexity. European Journal of Operational Research 132, (2): 326.

———. 2001. The role of production assumptions in data envelopment analysis. Thesis (doctoral)., Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, 2001.

Kuosmanen, Timo, Laurens Cherchye, and Timo Sipilainen. The law of one price in data envelopment analysis: Restricting weight flexibility across firms. European Journal of Operational Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .

Kuosmanen, Timo, and kauppakorkeakoulu Helsingin. 1999. Data envelopment analysis of non-convex technology : With an application to finnish super league pesis players. Working papers (helsingin kauppakorkeakoulu ; W-224). Helsinki: Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulu.

Kuosmanen, Timo, and Thierry Post. 2003. Measuring economic efficiency with incomplete price information. European Journal of Operational Research 144, (2): 454.

———. 2001. Measuring economic efficiency with incomplete price information: With an application to european commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research 134, (1): 43.

Kusbiantoro, . 1985. A study of urban mass transit performance: Concept, measurement, and explanation.Ph. D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Kwimbere, F. J. 1987. Measuring efficiency in not-for-profit organisations: An attempt to evaluate efficiency in selected U.K. university departments using data envelopment analysis (DEA).M.Sc. thesis, School of Management, University of Bath.

Ladany, S., Harold O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, and J. A. Turner. 1996. An analysis of the performance of university-affiliated credit unions. Computers and Operations Research 23, : 375.

Laguna, Manuel, and Johan Marklund. 2004. Business process modeling, simulation, and design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Lahdelma, Risto, and Pekka Salminen. Classifying efficient alternatives in SMAA using cross confidence factors. European Journal of Operational Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .

———. Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model. European Journal of Operational Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .

Laine, Juha, U. Harriet Finne-Soveri, Magnus Björkgren, Miika Linna, Anja Noro, and Unto Hakkinen. 2005. The association between quality of care and technical efficiency in long-term care.
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   ...   26


The database is protected by copyright ©sckool.org 2016
send message

    Main page