Giokas, D. I., and G. C. Pentzaropoulos. 2000. Efficient storage allocation for processing in backlog-controlled queueing networks using multicriteria techniques. European Journal of Operational Research 124, (3): 539.
———. 2000. Evaluating productive efficiency in telecommunications: Evidence from greece. Telecommunications Policy 24, (8-9): 781.
———. 1995. Evaluating the relative operational efficiency of large-scale computer-networks - an approach via data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling 19, (6): 363-370.
Giokas, Dimitris I. 2001. Greek hospitals: How well their resources are used. Omega 29, (1): 73.
Girod, Olivier Arthur. 1996. Measuring technical efficiency in a fuzzy environment (data envelopment, parametric programming, free disposal hull).Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 0247.
Giuffrida, A. 1999. Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: A malmquist index approach. Health Care Management Science 2, : 11.
Giuffrida, Antonio, and Hugh Gravelle. 2001. Measuring performance in primary care: Econometric analysis and DEA. Applied Economics 33, (2): 163-75.
Glass, J. C., G. McCallion, D. G. McKillop, Syamarlah Rasaratnam, and K. S. Stringer. Implications of variant efficiency measures for policy evaluations in UK higher education. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Glass, J. C., G. McCallion, D. G. McKillop, and K. Stringer. A 'technically level playing-field' profit efficiency analysis of enforced competition between publicly funded institutions. European Economic Review In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Glass, J. C., D. G. McKillop, and G. O'Rourke. 1998. A cost indirect evaluation of productivity change in UK universities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 10, (2): 153-175.
Golany, Boaz. 1995. A workshop on data envelopment analysis: General principles and application areas.
———. 1988. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 39, (8): 725-734.
———. 1988. A note on including ordinal relations among multipliers in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 34, (8): 1029-1033.
———. 1985. On chance constrained, competitive and cooperative evaluational methods in some problems of dynamic management.Ph. D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas.
Golany, Boaz, David B. Learner, Fred Y. Phillips, and John J. Rousseau. 1990. Efficiency and effectiveness in marketing management.
———. 1990. Managing service productivity: The data envelopment analysis perspective. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 14, (2): 89.
Golany, Boaz, F. Y. Phillips, and J. J. Rousseau. 1993. Models for improved effectiveness based on DEA efficiency results. IIE Transactions 25, (6): 2-10.
Golany, Boaz, Y. Roll, and D. Rybak. 1994. Measuring efficiency of power-plants in israel by data envelopment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 41, (3): 291-301.
Golany, Boaz, and Yaakov Roll. 1994. Incorporating standards via data envelopment analysis. In Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications., eds. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, Arie Y. Lewin and Lawrence M. Seiford. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
———. 1993. Some extensions of techniques to handle non-discretionary factors in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, (4): 419-432.
———. 1989. An application procedure for DEA. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 17, (3): 237-250.
Golany, Boaz, and John J. Rousseau. 1992. Efficiency evaluation games.
Golany, Boaz, and J. E. Storbeck. 1999. A data envelopment analysis of the operational efficiency of bank branches. Interfaces. 29, (3): 14-26.
Golany, Boaz, and E. Tamir. 1995. Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-offs - A data envelopment analysis approach. Management Science 41, (7): 1172-1184.
Golany, Boaz, and S. Thore. 1997. The competitiveness of nations. In IMPACT: How IC^2 institute affects public policy and business practices., eds. W. W. Cooper, S. Thore, D. Gobson and F. Phillips, 189-208. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
———. 1997. Restricted best practice selection in DEA: An overview with a case study evaluating the socio-economic performance of nations. Annals of Operations Research 73, : 117.
Golany, Boaz, and Sten Thore. 1997. The economic and social performance of nations: Efficiency and returns to scale. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 31, (3): 191.
Golany, Boaz, and Gang Yu. 1997. Estimating returns to scale in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 103, (1): 28.
———. 1995. A goal programming-discriminant function approach to the estimation of an empirical production function based on DEA results. Journal of Productivity Analysis 6, (2): 171-186.
Gold, Franklin Harold. 1982. Data envelopment analysis: An application to a savings and loan association.M. S. thesis, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, M.I.T.
Golden, Peggy A. 1989. Measuring organizational slack and an application of the slack construct to the prediction of merger and acquisition.D. B. A. dissertation, University of Kentucky.
Goldstein, Harvey. 1990. Data envelopment analysis: An exposition and critique. Evaluation and Research in Education 4, (1): 17-20.
Gong, Byeong-Ho. 1987. Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontier and data envelopment models in the estimation of firm-specific technical efficiency using panel data.Ph. D. dissertation, Rice University.
Gong, Byeong-Ho, and Robin C. Sickles. 1992. Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using panel data. Journal of Econometrics 51, (1-2): 259.
Gong, Linguo, and Bruce Sun. 1998. Measuring production with random inputs and outputs using DEA and certainty equivalent. European Journal of Operational Research 111, (1): 62.
———. 1995. Efficiency measurement of production operations under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics 39, (1-2): 55.
Gonzalez, Eduardo, and Antonio Alvarez. 2001. From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark. European Journal of Operational Research 133, (3): 512.
Gonzalez-Lima, Maria D. 1995. Effective computation of the analytic center of the solution set in linear programming using primal-dual interior-point methods (data envelopment analysis).Ph.D. dissertation, Rice University; 0187.
Gonzalez-Lima, Maria D., R. A. Tapia, and R. M. Thrall. 1996. On the construction of strong complementary slackness solutions for DEA linear programming problems using a primal-dual interior-point method. Annals of Operations Research 66, : 139-162.
Good, David H., Lars-Hendrik Roller, and Robin C. Sickles. 1995. Airline efficiency differences between europe and the US: Implications for the pace of EC integration and domestic regulation. European Journal of Operational Research 80, (3): 508-518.
Goto, Mika, and Miki Tsutsui. 1998. Comparison of productive and cost efficiencies among japanese and US electric utilities. Omega 26, (2): 177.
Granderson, Gerald, and Carl Linvill. 2002. Regulation, efficiency, and granger causality. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20, (9): 1225.
———. 1998. Nonparametric measurement of productive efficiency in the presence of regulation. European Journal of Operational Research 110, (3): 643.
Grazhdaninova, Margarita, and Zvi Lerman. 2005. Allocative and technical efficiency of corporate farms in russia. Comparative Economic Studies 47, : 200.
Green, R. 1996. Dynamics of data envelopment analysis: Theory of systems efficiency - sengupta,jk. Journal of the Operational Research Society 47, (11): 1421.
Green, R., and J. R. Doyle. 1996. Improving discernment in DEA using profiling: A comment. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 24, (3): 365-366.
Green, R. H. 1996. DIY DEA: Implementing data envelopment analysis in the mathematical programming language AMPL. Omega 24, (4): 489.
Green, R. H., Wade D. Cook, and J. R. Doyle. 1997. A note on the additive data envelopment analysis model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48, : 446.
Green, R. H., and D. H. Davis. 1988. Data envelopment analysis, the NAG library and unix. NAG Newsletter(1/88).
Green, R. H., and J. R. Doyle. 1997. Implementing data envelopment analysis - primal or dual. INFOR 35, (1): 66-75.
———. 1995. On maximizing discrimination in multiple criteria decision-making. Journal of the Operational Research Society 46, (2): 192-204.
Green, Rodney H., J. R. Doyle, and Wade D. Cook. 1996. Efficiency bounds in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 89, (3): 482.
———. 1996. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 90, (3): 461.
Greenberg, Robert, and Thomas R. Nunamaker. 1987. A generalized multiple criteria model for control and evaluation of nonprofit organizations. Financial Accountability and Management 3, (4): 331-342.
Gregoriou, Greg N. 2004. Commodity trading advisors : Risk, performance analysis, and selection. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Gregoriou, Greg N., Komlan Sedzro, and Joe Zhu. 2005. Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 164, (2): 555.
Gregoriou, Greg N., and Joe Zhu. 2005. Evaluating hedge fund and CTA performance : Data envelopment analysis approach. Wiley finance series. Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley.
Grifelltatje, E., and C. A. Knox Lovell. 1997. The sources of productivity change in spanish banking. European Journal of Operational Research 98, (2): 364-380.
Grifell-Tatje, E., and C. A. Knox Lovell. 1997. A DEA-based analysis of productivity change and intertemporal managerial performance. Annals of Operations Research 73, : 177-189.
———. 1995. Deregulation and productivity decline: The case of spanish savings banks. European Economic Review.
Grigorian, David A., Vlad Manole, and International Monetary Fund. Middle Eastern Dept.,. 2002. Determinants of commercial bank performance in transition : An application of data envelopment analysis. IMF working paper ; WP/02/146. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund Middle Eastern Department.
Grizzle, G. A. 1993. Making government efficient - how much waste can be cut from public programs. International Journal of Public Administration 16, (7): 969-983.
Grogan, Thomas Joseph. 1993. A data envelopment analysis of eighth grade mathematics instruction with a comparison of catholic and public schools.Ph. D. dissertation, University Of Cincinnati.
Grönqvist, Erik, and Lotta Holm Sjögren. 1999. Produktivitetsmätning med DEA-metoden : Barnmedicinska kliniker. Stockholm: Spri.
Grosskopf, Shawna. 1996. Statistical-inference and nonparametric efficiency - A selective survey. Journal of Productivity Analysis 7, (2-3): 161-176.
———. 1986. The role of the reference technology in measuring productive efficiency. Economic Journal 96, : 499-513.
Grosskopf, Shawna, K. Hayes, L. Taylor, and W. Weber. 1999. Anticipating the consequences of school reform: A new use of DEA. Management Science 45, (4): 608-620.
Grosskopf, Shawna, Dimitri Margaritis, and Vivian Valdmanis. 2004. Competitive effects on teaching hospitals. European Journal of Operational Research 154, (2): 515.
———. 2001. The effects of teaching on hospital productivity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35, (3): 189.
Grosskopf, Shawna, and Chad Moutray. 2001. Evaluating performance in chicago public high schools in the wake of decentralization. Economics of Education Review 20, (1): 1.
Grosskopf, Shawna, and V. Valdmanis. 1993. Evaluating hospital performance with case-mix-adjusted outputs. Medical Care 31, (6): 525-532.
Grosskopf, Shawna, and Vivian Valdmanis. 1987. Measuring hospital performance : A non-parametric approach. Journal of Health Economics 6, : 89-107.
Grunnesjö, Ulf. 1989. Operativ effektivitet inom bankkontorsrörelse : En tillämpning av data envelopment analysis. Seminarieuppsatser från handelshögskolan i stockholm. ämneskurs 1, ekonomisk analys och styrning, 1989:8. Stockholm,: .
Grupp, H., S. Maital, A. Frenkel, and K. Koschatzky. 1992. A data envelopment model to compare technological excellence and export sales in israel and european community countries. Research Evaluation 2, (2): 87-101.
Grupp, Hariolf. 1997. External effects as a microeconomic determinant of innovation efficiency. International Journal of the Economics of Business 4, (2): 173-187.
Grupp, Hariolf, and Shlomo Maital. 2001. Managing new product development and innovation : A microeconomic toolbox. New horizons in the economics of innovation. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Gstach, D. 1998. Another approach to data envelopment analysis in noisy environments: DEA+. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9, : 161.
Gstach, Dieter. 2005. Estimating output targets to evaluate output-specific efficiencies: A statistical framework. European Journal of Operational Research 161, (2): 564.
———. 1995. Comparing structural efficiency of unbalanced subsamples: A resampling adaptation of data envelopment analysis. Empirical Economics 20, (3): 531-42.
Gstach, Dieter, and Volkswirtschaft Wirtschaftsuniversit*t Wien Reihe. 1993. Scale efficiency : Where data envelopment analysis outperforms stochastic production function estimation. Working paper (Wirtschaftsuniversit*t wien. reihe volkswirtschaft) ; no.23. Wien: Department of economics Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.
Gu, Zheng. 2004. Management science application in tourism and hospitality. New York: Haworth Hospitality Press.
Guan, Jian Cheng, Richard C. M. Yam, Chiu Kam Mok, and Ning Ma. A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Guddat, Jurgen, Hubertus Th Jongen, Bernd Kummer, and Frantisek Nozicka. 1991. Parametric optimization and related topics: Papers from the second international conference. Eisenach.
Guida, Eric M. 2004. Data envelopment analysis benchmarking and comment. Thesis (M.S.)., Pennsylvania State University, 2004.
Gulledge, Thomas R. 1990. Book review: Applications of modern production theory: Efficiency and productivity by dogramaci and F\"are. Interfaces 20, (2): 87-88.
Gulledge, Thomas R., and C. A. Knox Lovell. 1992. International applications of productivity and efficiency analysis : A special issue of the journal of productivity analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Guo, Peijun, and Hideo Tanaka. 2001. Fuzzy DEA: A perceptual evaluation method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 119, (1): 149.
Gupta, J. K. S. 1997. CONTRIBUTIONS TO DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS. Cybernetics and Systems 28, : 79.
Gupta, Surendra M., and Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers.,. 2004. Environmentally conscious manufacturing III : 29-30 october, 2003, providence, rhode island, USA. Bellingham, Wash.: SPIE.
Gustafsson, Kristian. 2003. Effektivitetsstudier med "data envelopment analysis" : En teoretisk studie med empirisk tillämpning på svensk fjärrvärme = efficiency studies with "data envelopment analysis" : A theoretical study with empirical application to swedish district heating. Examensarbete / SLU, institutionen för ekonomi, 319. Uppsala: Sveriges lantbruksuniv.
Gutierrez-Nieto, Begona, Carlos Serrano-Cinca, and Cecilio Mar Molinero. Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Guy Blaise, Nkamleu. 2004. Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in african agriculture. African Development Review 16, : 203.
Haag, Jerry T., Jerry T. Haag, Ilene F. Levine, and University of Minnesota Duluth. Bureau of Business and Economic Research).,. 1993. Augmenting the analysis of financial statements with technical stability indices in data envelopment analysis. Duluth, Minn.: Bureau of Business and Economics Research.
Haag, S. E., and P. V. Jaska. 1992. Interpreting inefficiency ratings: An application of bank branch operating efficiencies. Managerial and Decision Economics 16, (1): 7-14.
Haag, Stephen E., Raymond L. Raab, and University of Minnesota Duluth. Bureau of Business and Economic Research.,. 1993. A current survey of the development and application of data envelopment analysis and a comparison to stochastic approaches. Duluth, Minn.: Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Minnesota.
Haag, Stephen, Patrick V. Jaska, and John Semple. 1992. Assessing the relative efficiency of agricultural production units in the blackland prairie, texas. Applied Economics 24, (5): 559-565.
Haas, David A. 1998. Evaluating the efficiency of municipal reverse logistics channels: An application of data envelopment analysis (solid waste disposal).Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University; 0225.
Haas, David A., and Frederic H. Murphy. 2003. Compensating for non-homogeneity in decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 144, (3): 530.
Hackman, S. T., E. H. Frazelle, P. M. Griffin, S. O. Griffin, and D. A. Vlatsa. 2001. Benchmarking warehousing and distribution operations: An input-output approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 16, : 79.
Hackman, Steven T. 1990. An axiomatic framework of dynamic production. Journal of Productivity Analysis 1, (4): 309-324.
Hackman, Steven T., and Ury Passy. 1989. A consistent, reflexive duality framework of production: An application of quasi-concave conjugacy theory. Journal of Economics 49, (2): 183-198.
Hackman, Steven T., Ury Passy, and Loren K. Platzman. 1994. Explicit representation of the two-dimensional section of a production possibility set. Journal of Productivity Analysis 5, (2): 161-170.
Hadjicostas, Petros, and Andreas C. Soteriou. One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: A theoretical framework. European Journal of Operational Research In Press, Corrected Proof, .
Haghighat, Mehdi Sohrabi, and Esmaile Khorram. 2005. The maximum and minimum number of efficient units in DEA with interval data. Applied Mathematics and Computation 163, (2): 919.
Hailu, A., and T. S. Veeman. 2003. Comparative analysis of efficiency and productivity growth in canadian regional boreal logging industries. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33, : 1653.
Hailu, Atakelty, and Terrence S. Veeman. 2001. Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the canadian pulp and paper industry.